2018
DOI: 10.1111/ajgw.12354
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting protein haze formation in white wines

Abstract: Background and Aims Wine protein haze formation is commonly predicted by a heat test; however, the conditions used in the test can vary widely between laboratories. Here, we investigate the influence of heating and cooling conditions on heat test results. Methods and Results White wines were heated at 80°C for a time that varied from 0.5 to 6.0 h and then cooled for 0.5–18 h at either 0, 4 or 20°C. The turbidity was measured before heating and after cooling. Longer heating times, longer cooling times and a low… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Carrageenan stock solution (10 g/L in wine) or bentonite stock solution (250 g/L in water) were added to wine samples (150 mL each in triplicate) to give a final concentration between 0.2 and 1.4 g/L in 0.2 g/L increments. Samples were then shaken to mix and kept overnight at room temperature before filtering at 0.45 μm (Ultipor N66, Pall Corporation, New York, NY, USA) and assessing the heat stability of each sample as previously described (McRae et al ). The concentration of each heat‐stabilising agent that produced a change in turbidity before and after heat treatment (80°C for 2 h, 20°C for 3 h) of <2.0 nephelometric turbidity units (NTU) (Hach model 2100P nephlometer, Loveland, CO, USA) was considered the recommended dose.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carrageenan stock solution (10 g/L in wine) or bentonite stock solution (250 g/L in water) were added to wine samples (150 mL each in triplicate) to give a final concentration between 0.2 and 1.4 g/L in 0.2 g/L increments. Samples were then shaken to mix and kept overnight at room temperature before filtering at 0.45 μm (Ultipor N66, Pall Corporation, New York, NY, USA) and assessing the heat stability of each sample as previously described (McRae et al ). The concentration of each heat‐stabilising agent that produced a change in turbidity before and after heat treatment (80°C for 2 h, 20°C for 3 h) of <2.0 nephelometric turbidity units (NTU) (Hach model 2100P nephlometer, Loveland, CO, USA) was considered the recommended dose.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heat stability test. The heat stability of samples was assessed using the 5 h heat test described previously (McRae et al 2018a). Briefly, samples (50 mL) were filtered using a 0.45 μm cellulose nitrate membrane (Sartorius Stedim Biotech, Goettingen, Germany) heated in an 80 C hot water bath (Ratek) for 2 h, then kept at 20 C (room temperature) for 3 h after cooling.…”
Section: Chemical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Protein stability was assessed by determining the induced haze value following the heat test according to McRae et al [ 58 ]. Briefly, wine aliquots were first filtered (0.45 μm, acetate cellulose membranes) and then heated at 80 °C for 2 h. Successively, these aliquots were cooled at 4 °C for 16 h and left at room temperature for 2 h before measuring the turbidity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%