2016
DOI: 10.1007/s13042-015-0450-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting protein–protein interaction sites using modified support vector machine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies showed that support vector machine (SVM) and its improved methods can predict effectively protein interaction sites [9][10][11][12][13][14]. Computational algorithms such as random forests, KNN, and Naive Bayes Classifier have been also applied to the prediction of PPIs [15][16][17][18]. Wang et al proposed a new method for predicting protein interaction sites in hetero-complexes using a radial basis function neural network (RBFNN) set model, which uses only evolutionary conservation information and spatial sequence profile of proteins, and achieved a good predictive result [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies showed that support vector machine (SVM) and its improved methods can predict effectively protein interaction sites [9][10][11][12][13][14]. Computational algorithms such as random forests, KNN, and Naive Bayes Classifier have been also applied to the prediction of PPIs [15][16][17][18]. Wang et al proposed a new method for predicting protein interaction sites in hetero-complexes using a radial basis function neural network (RBFNN) set model, which uses only evolutionary conservation information and spatial sequence profile of proteins, and achieved a good predictive result [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…XGBPRH employs XGBoost as the classifier to determine the hot spots in protein–RNA interfaces with the six optimal features. In order to demonstrate the effectiveness of XGBoost, we used support vector machines (SVMs) [64], random forest (RF), and gradient tree boosting (GTB) to build different models and compared them with XGBPRH. Comparisons were performed with 10-fold cross validation over 50 trials according to the six optimal features.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 50 , and machine learning based approach of Guo et al . 51 . The non-redundant database of PPIIs (NRDB) is created to facilitate the developments of such prediction tools.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%