2019
DOI: 10.1108/jcom-02-2019-0030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting public support: applying theory to prosocial behaviors

Abstract: Purpose The purpose of this paper is to apply communication theory to explore and help explain public support for causes and organizations in the form of prosocial behaviors, including donating, volunteering and participating in advocacy efforts. Design/methodology/approach Through a survey of people (n=1,275) living in the USA who indicated supporting issues they cared about in 2017, this research gathered information about motivations for providing public support for various causes and non-profit organizat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since its introduction, scholars have demonstrated the conceptual and empirical power of situational motivation in problem solving in predicting publics’ issue-specific (communicative) behaviors (e.g., Krishna & Kim, 2020). Researchers have proposed and established situational motivation not only as a proxy for the three perceptual variables of the STOPS, that is, problem, constraint, and involvement recognition (e.g., J.-N. Kim et al, 2011), but also as a powerful predictor of communicative action (Chon & Park, 2020) and behaviors (Jiang et al, 2019; B. W. McKeever et al, 2019).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since its introduction, scholars have demonstrated the conceptual and empirical power of situational motivation in problem solving in predicting publics’ issue-specific (communicative) behaviors (e.g., Krishna & Kim, 2020). Researchers have proposed and established situational motivation not only as a proxy for the three perceptual variables of the STOPS, that is, problem, constraint, and involvement recognition (e.g., J.-N. Kim et al, 2011), but also as a powerful predictor of communicative action (Chon & Park, 2020) and behaviors (Jiang et al, 2019; B. W. McKeever et al, 2019).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advocacy behavioral intentions were measured with five items ( M = 4.18, SD = 1.89, α = 0.92, e.g. I'd like to attend a March or rally related to the plastics pollution campaign) adopted from McKeever et al. (2019).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, 2019), and specific engagement in supportive behaviors related to social issues (e.g. attending rallies and signing online petitions) (McKeever et al. , 2019).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The implications for practitioners managing communications or organizations involved in such work were discussed. That study provides theoretical value that contributes to the generalization of the STOPS model to communication scholars and discusses its practical implications for nonprofit organizations and other types of organizations, although its scope of application is not large ( Mckeever et al, 2019 ). Duckett critiqued the transparency and legitimacy of participatory scenario planning based on Habermas’ “communication action theory,” considering a case study focused on the development of scenarios in the livestock sector in Scotland.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%