2002
DOI: 10.3171/jns.2002.97.2.0326
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting recovery in patients suffering from traumatic brain injury by using admission variables and physiological data: a comparison between decision tree analysis and logistic regression

Abstract: Decision tree analysis confirmed some of the results of logistic regression and challenged others. This investigation shows that there is knowledge to be gained from analyzing observational data with the aid of decision tree analysis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
118
1
5

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 202 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
118
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…2). Even though there is a lack of consensus regarding the ideal range of CPP after TBI, and the error difference of more than 10 mm Hg may or may not be clinically relevant depending on the duration of such a discrepancy, 4,41 both the normal CPP range of 70-85 mm Hg 41 and suggestions for maintaining a CPP of at least 70 mm Hg after head injury, 35 or between 50 and 70 mm Hg, 7 or at a static autoregulation range (i.e., 60-70 mm Hg) 12 are within the range of the highest accuracy of eCPP. This ability of eCPP to estimate CPP most accurately at an expected or suggested level of CPP seems promising for clinical use of the method.…”
Section: Cerebral Perfusion Pressure As a Numbermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2). Even though there is a lack of consensus regarding the ideal range of CPP after TBI, and the error difference of more than 10 mm Hg may or may not be clinically relevant depending on the duration of such a discrepancy, 4,41 both the normal CPP range of 70-85 mm Hg 41 and suggestions for maintaining a CPP of at least 70 mm Hg after head injury, 35 or between 50 and 70 mm Hg, 7 or at a static autoregulation range (i.e., 60-70 mm Hg) 12 are within the range of the highest accuracy of eCPP. This ability of eCPP to estimate CPP most accurately at an expected or suggested level of CPP seems promising for clinical use of the method.…”
Section: Cerebral Perfusion Pressure As a Numbermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,15,29,31,39 Hence, monitoring and management of CPP will remain one of the cornerstones of TBI management, even though it is recognized that further work is required in terms of patient-specific thresholds. 4,41 For this reason, the development of noninvasive methods to monitor CPP is reasonable and could provide an additional option in resource-limited settings or for patients who have contraindications for invasive monitoring.…”
Section: The Role Of Icpmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Andrews et al, conducted a comparative study between decision trees and logistic regression to predict improvement in patients with ABI [13]. In Yi et al [14], compared different learning techniques (decision tree, adaboost, support vector machine and artificial neural networks) to be used as a decision support tool based on rules for the treatment of patients with TBI.…”
Section: Predictive Data Mining In Abi Rehabilitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The best-known methods are decision trees (DT) and ANNs, both of which are widely used in the ABI literature [13,14].…”
Section: Predictive Data Mining In Abi Rehabilitationmentioning
confidence: 99%