1988
DOI: 10.1097/00006324-198804000-00009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting Refractive Astigmatism: A Suggested Simplification of Javalʼs Rule

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
31
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, the constant for subjects with clinically significant WTR astigmatism (subjects with refractive J0 ‡ 0.50, equivalent to 1.00 D WTR astigmatism in clinical notation) is approximately À0.25 D of J0 (equivalent to 0.50 D ATR astigmatism in clinical notation). These results are consistent with modifications of Javal's rule specifying that the relation between keratometric astigmatism and refractive astigmatism is best described as magnitude of keratometric astigmatism minus an ATR constant of 0.50 D. 10 The ATR internal astigmatism constant appeared to ''compensate'' for WTR keratometric astigmatism in the present study, resulting in lower levels of WTR refractive astigmatism. However, because the magnitude of internal astigmatism is not negatively correlated with the magnitude of keratometric astigmatism, the data suggest a consistent ATR contribution from internal astigmatism-a passive compensation that can be attributed to the fact that our sample consists primarily of children with high WTR keratometric astigmatism.…”
Section: Relation Between J0 Keratometric Astigmatism and J0 Internalsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In the present study, the constant for subjects with clinically significant WTR astigmatism (subjects with refractive J0 ‡ 0.50, equivalent to 1.00 D WTR astigmatism in clinical notation) is approximately À0.25 D of J0 (equivalent to 0.50 D ATR astigmatism in clinical notation). These results are consistent with modifications of Javal's rule specifying that the relation between keratometric astigmatism and refractive astigmatism is best described as magnitude of keratometric astigmatism minus an ATR constant of 0.50 D. 10 The ATR internal astigmatism constant appeared to ''compensate'' for WTR keratometric astigmatism in the present study, resulting in lower levels of WTR refractive astigmatism. However, because the magnitude of internal astigmatism is not negatively correlated with the magnitude of keratometric astigmatism, the data suggest a consistent ATR contribution from internal astigmatism-a passive compensation that can be attributed to the fact that our sample consists primarily of children with high WTR keratometric astigmatism.…”
Section: Relation Between J0 Keratometric Astigmatism and J0 Internalsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Magnitude of internal astigmatism was close to the 0.50 D ATR constant reported by Javal and others. 10,11 Internal astigmatism was consistent across age groups (Table 1) and magnitude of keratometric astigmatism (Table 3); and 4. Changes with age in keratometric and internal J0 were negatively correlated in both cohorts, suggesting that changes in internal astigmatism may actively compensate for changes in keratometric astigmatism and contribute to the overall stability of WTR refractive astigmatism in childhood (Table 6).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Corneal astigmatism was plotted against total astigmatism for the different pupil sizes and the relationship between corneal and total astigmatism was found to be independent of pupil size. The results from this study supported Javal's rule as simplified by Grosvenor, Quintero and Perrigin (1988).…”
Section: Corneal and Internal Astigmatismsupporting
confidence: 80%