Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
We're not British values teachers are we?" Muslim teachers' subjectivity and the governmentality of unease This paper is a critical investigation of a group of 8 Muslim religious education (RE) teachers' views of fundamental British values in education (FBV). Findings demonstrate that as teachers of multicultural RE, they experience dissonance accommodating the requirements of FBV, and are critical of its divisive effects upon their students. They are able to reclaim some professional agency through their problematization of FBV and reinterpretation of its requirements through the pluralistic discourse of RE. Drawing from Foucault's analysis of power, we argue that the teachers' views reveal that FBV is a disciplinary discourse, acting upon teacher and student bodies as a classificatory and social sorting instrument, which we conceptualise as an expression of the 'governmentality of unease'. We conclude that further empirical research is required to critically examine how teachers are enacting this policy to assess how FBV continues to shape the education environment and the student and teacher subjects of its discourse. This paper offers a critical examination of the views of 8 Muslim teachers of RE on fundamental British values (FBV). FBV were introduced into the new teachers' standards in 2012 which set out the professional duties of teachers and the minimum baseline requirements for teachers' practice and conduct (DfE, 2013). The standards included the requirement to uphold public trust by "not undermining fundamental British values" (DfE, 2013, 14). Notably, FBV were not defined by educationalists, nor were they agreed upon through a process of democratic debate, rather, the definition was taken directly from the controversial Prevent strategy, a key element of Contest, the UK government's counter terrorism programme, which states that, "Extremism is vocal or active opposition to fundamental British values, including democracy, the rule of law, individual liberty, and mutual respect and tolerance of those with different faiths and beliefs" (HM Government, 2011, 107).
We're not British values teachers are we?" Muslim teachers' subjectivity and the governmentality of unease This paper is a critical investigation of a group of 8 Muslim religious education (RE) teachers' views of fundamental British values in education (FBV). Findings demonstrate that as teachers of multicultural RE, they experience dissonance accommodating the requirements of FBV, and are critical of its divisive effects upon their students. They are able to reclaim some professional agency through their problematization of FBV and reinterpretation of its requirements through the pluralistic discourse of RE. Drawing from Foucault's analysis of power, we argue that the teachers' views reveal that FBV is a disciplinary discourse, acting upon teacher and student bodies as a classificatory and social sorting instrument, which we conceptualise as an expression of the 'governmentality of unease'. We conclude that further empirical research is required to critically examine how teachers are enacting this policy to assess how FBV continues to shape the education environment and the student and teacher subjects of its discourse. This paper offers a critical examination of the views of 8 Muslim teachers of RE on fundamental British values (FBV). FBV were introduced into the new teachers' standards in 2012 which set out the professional duties of teachers and the minimum baseline requirements for teachers' practice and conduct (DfE, 2013). The standards included the requirement to uphold public trust by "not undermining fundamental British values" (DfE, 2013, 14). Notably, FBV were not defined by educationalists, nor were they agreed upon through a process of democratic debate, rather, the definition was taken directly from the controversial Prevent strategy, a key element of Contest, the UK government's counter terrorism programme, which states that, "Extremism is vocal or active opposition to fundamental British values, including democracy, the rule of law, individual liberty, and mutual respect and tolerance of those with different faiths and beliefs" (HM Government, 2011, 107).
Australian education and schooling. In our analysis we suggest that the two dominant discourses, one focusing on securitisation and one on westernisation, have to this point operated separately, but have both focused on narrow, fixed and forced understandings of Australian values. Exploring the key themes of these two discourses, some important issues for teacher educators are set out, including the need to mediate these discourses against research evidence which suggests the importance of holistic and co-operative pedagogical relationships based on trust and humility for effective values education. Though our analysis focuses on the Australian context, the arguments made are likely to be of interest elsewhere given current debates about national values in education across a range of jurisdictions.
International research and pedagogy ISSN: 0260-7476 (Print) 1360-0540 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/cjet20 'Why all of a sudden do we need to teach fundamental British values?' A critical investigation of religious education student teacher positioning within a policy discourse of discipline and control Francis Farrell To cite this article: Francis Farrell (2016) 'Why all of a sudden do we need to teach fundamental British values?' A critical investigation of religious education student teacher positioning within a policy discourse of discipline and control, Journal of Education for Teaching, 42:3, 280-297, ABSTRACT This paper presents a critical investigation of a group of 11 religious education (RE) student teachers' views of the promotion of fundamental British values (FBV) undertaken in 2015.Using qualitative methods, data were collected in two semi-structured group interviews. Drawing from the perspectives of Foucauldian methodology and critical theory, this paper examines the extent to which student teachers were able to align the FBV discourse with their own personal and professional positioning. Findings demonstrate little consensus about what constitutes Britishness. There is evidence of dissonance in the student teachers' views that FBV sends out contradictory messages. The student teachers are committed to the development of learners' moral imaginations, but are concerned by the capacity of FBV to alienate learners and its incompatibility with the pluralism of RE. The paper argues that it is through the development of teacher subjectivity in the alternative discourses of critical RE and research that practitioners will be able to make adjustments that can accommodate and re-appropriate the demands of policy.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.