2018
DOI: 10.1080/0886571x.2018.1558162
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting Repeated Child and Adolescent Residential Treatment Placements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The discussions themselves are complicated and not always easily navigated because of the very significant variations across national and often regional jurisdictions in how residential care systems for children and youth fit into other systems such as child welfare, child and youth mental health, health care, and education. Nevertheless, it is fair to summarize these discussions as having an overwhelming focus on indicators and outcomes, which are sometimes articulated in the form of clinically measurable outcomes (improved scores on validated assessment instruments as part of pre-/post-program evaluation designs) and at other times in the context of placement outcomes (return to family) [17][18][19][20]. Thrown into the mix often without much theoretical framing are additional process and experiential items such as child and youth participation and voice, family engagement, educational outcomes, outcomes with respect to social participation, and avoidance of youth criminal justice systems, to name a few.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discussions themselves are complicated and not always easily navigated because of the very significant variations across national and often regional jurisdictions in how residential care systems for children and youth fit into other systems such as child welfare, child and youth mental health, health care, and education. Nevertheless, it is fair to summarize these discussions as having an overwhelming focus on indicators and outcomes, which are sometimes articulated in the form of clinically measurable outcomes (improved scores on validated assessment instruments as part of pre-/post-program evaluation designs) and at other times in the context of placement outcomes (return to family) [17][18][19][20]. Thrown into the mix often without much theoretical framing are additional process and experiential items such as child and youth participation and voice, family engagement, educational outcomes, outcomes with respect to social participation, and avoidance of youth criminal justice systems, to name a few.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%