2009 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC) 2009
DOI: 10.1109/vlhcc.2009.5295290
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting reuse of end-user web macro scripts

Abstract: Repositories of code written by end-user programmers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These levels of reuse do not appear to be markedly higher than the level of reuse previously observed in a study of CoScripter web macro reuse [21]. In that study over a 90 day period, only 4% of web macros were ever copied and used to create another macro by any person other than the original macro author.…”
Section: Frequency Of Downloading and Remixingmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These levels of reuse do not appear to be markedly higher than the level of reuse previously observed in a study of CoScripter web macro reuse [21]. In that study over a 90 day period, only 4% of web macros were ever copied and used to create another macro by any person other than the original macro author.…”
Section: Frequency Of Downloading and Remixingmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Two of these field studies examined spreadsheet programming; one was an analysis of over 4000 spreadsheets downloaded from the web [5], while the second was a survey of several studies looking at error rates in spreadsheets that companies had created [16]. The other two studies examined web macros (scripts that automate browser actions, for instance to direct the browser to visit a certain URL, to fill out a web form, then to submit it); one study of 120 macros aimed to characterize what kinds of macros were being created [1], while the other study of over 700 macros identified traits that differentiated oft-reused macros from rarely-reused macros [21]. These studies are useful points of comparison because they yielded statistics about the size, complexity and reuse of enduser programs, providing a quantitative basis for assessing how well Scratch is succeeding relative to other end-user programming environments.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pipes is a programming platform for creating mashups of RSS feeds; CoScripter (formerly called Koala) is an environment for creating web macro scripts that automate a browser's interactions with web sites (Little et al, 2007). An empirical study inspected the web macros that end users published in the CoScripter wiki, in order to explore what kinds of macros are commonly shared and reused (Scaffidi et al, 2009). This study discovered that code was much more likely to be reused if it had certain properties (e.g., if the code used variables and never referenced any intranet URLs), what might be termed a "good scent."…”
Section: Empirical Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%