2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.07.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting risky sexual behaviors among college student drinkers as a function of event-level drinking motives and alcohol use

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
27
1
8

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
4
27
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…This prospective model offers a novel pathway explaining the relationship between substance use and unprotected sex. In contrast to evidence for event-level relationships between substance use and unprotected sex that can be explained by the alcohol myopia theory (e.g., MacDonald, MacDonald, Zanna, & Fong, 2000) and expectancy and motive theories (Dermen, Cooper, & Agocha, 1998; Dvorak et al, 2016; Kilwein & Looby, 2018), results highlight a more distal relationship between substance use and unprotected sex. One explanation for findings could be related to peer affiliation (Staras, Tobler, Maldonado-Molina, & Cook, 2011); there may be unique group norms regarding sexual risk and pregnancy among adolescent substance users, and thus, affiliation with substance-using peer groups may influence one’s attitudes about sexual risk and concerns about pregnancy.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This prospective model offers a novel pathway explaining the relationship between substance use and unprotected sex. In contrast to evidence for event-level relationships between substance use and unprotected sex that can be explained by the alcohol myopia theory (e.g., MacDonald, MacDonald, Zanna, & Fong, 2000) and expectancy and motive theories (Dermen, Cooper, & Agocha, 1998; Dvorak et al, 2016; Kilwein & Looby, 2018), results highlight a more distal relationship between substance use and unprotected sex. One explanation for findings could be related to peer affiliation (Staras, Tobler, Maldonado-Molina, & Cook, 2011); there may be unique group norms regarding sexual risk and pregnancy among adolescent substance users, and thus, affiliation with substance-using peer groups may influence one’s attitudes about sexual risk and concerns about pregnancy.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The association between adolescent substance use and unprotected sex is well-documented (Connell, Gilreath, & Hansen, 2009). Although extensive research has highlighted event-level relationships between marijuana (Kingree, Braithwaite, & Woodring, 2000; Schumacher, Marzell, Toepp, & Schweizer, 2018) and alcohol (Dvorak et al, 2016; Kilwein & Looby, 2018) use and unprotected sex, there are likely other non-event-level explanations for higher rates of unprotected sex and unplanned pregnancy among substance-using adolescents. Specifically, there is evidence that sex-related attitudes and risk perceptions regarding sex are associated with actual sexual behaviors (Albarracín et al, 2005); for example, attitudes toward condoms are associated with actual condom use among adolescents (Halpern-Felsher, Kropp, Boyer, Tschann, & Ellen, 2004; Weinman, Small, Buzi, & Smith, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main limiting factor is the use of self‐report measures of occasion characteristics that lack validation. Some papers use well‐validated self‐report scales for more complex predictors, particularly psychological constructs such as drinking motives or mood . Measures for some simple contextual characteristics, such as the day of the week, may not require validation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The behavior of the studied person can be considered in terms of social approval; dangers to people around; development of the state and society in general; in terms of respect for precepts of law and legality. If to consider such deviation (according to matrix of social deviations of N.V. Maysak) as sexual deviations (masochism) -this behavior, most likely, is deviation from normal, is social not approved, but it does not bear any danger to people around, hardly considerably influences development of society in general and does not carry any legal regulation, therefore, is not pursued by the law, despite this such behavior you should not lose sight and it has to make the contribution to the generalized indicator of deviation [11]. Any phenomenon has to make various contribution to the generalized indicator characterizing behavior of the person depending on the first-priority purpose which induced this research -studying of tendency to commission of illegal acts or allocation of pupils of the general education organizations for carrying out scheduled maintenance by the juvenile officer.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%