2001
DOI: 10.1046/j.1364-727x.2001.00021.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting safety and quality parameters for UHT‐processed milks

Abstract: A spreadsheet was developed to evaluate safety and quality parameters for milks subjected to different heating and cooling profiles and holding time conditions in a continuous heat exchanger. Safety parameters evaluated were lethality ( Fo ) and microbial inactivation ( B *) values; quality parameters were chemical change ( C *), thiamin loss, lactulose formation, Maillard browning and hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) formation. The spreadsheet was used to predict these parameters for a pilot plant, heating milks a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Raw goats' milk was supplied by Delamere Dairies (Yew Tree Farm, Knutsford, Cheshire, UK) and Willowbrook Farm, Garford, Abingdon, UK. It was subjected to indirect UHT treatment using an APV Junior plate heat exchanger, described and characterised in terms of its temperature/ time heating profiles and corresponding B* and C* by Browning et al (2001). Four batches of raw goats' milk were processed using the same conditions of 140 8C for 2 s. Upstream homogenization during the heat treatment was at a pressure of 180 bar.…”
Section: Milk Samples and Processing Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Raw goats' milk was supplied by Delamere Dairies (Yew Tree Farm, Knutsford, Cheshire, UK) and Willowbrook Farm, Garford, Abingdon, UK. It was subjected to indirect UHT treatment using an APV Junior plate heat exchanger, described and characterised in terms of its temperature/ time heating profiles and corresponding B* and C* by Browning et al (2001). Four batches of raw goats' milk were processed using the same conditions of 140 8C for 2 s. Upstream homogenization during the heat treatment was at a pressure of 180 bar.…”
Section: Milk Samples and Processing Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the above-mentioned tristimulus systems, spectral reflectance measurements (400 to 700 nm) are also a suitable estimate of degree of Instrumental measurement of milk flavour and colour 197 whiteness in milk (Nelson, 1948;Quin Äones et al, 1997;Solah et al, 2007). Some recent applications of colorimetric and spectrophotometric systems for measurement of colour in milk products can be found in the published literature (Nielsen et al, 1997;Browning et al, 2001;Gervilla et al, 2001;Nozie Áre et al, 2006;Solah et al, 2007;Popov-Raljic  et al, 2008).…”
Section: Measurement Of Colourmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Several factors are known to promote browning reactions in milk products, including use of excessive processing temperatures and adverse storage conditions. Heating of fluid milk has two main effects on its colour: at moderate temperatures (65ëC) or immediately after a UHT process an initial`whitening' may occur, while at high temperatures (>90ëC) browning readily occurs due to the Maillard reaction (Burton, 1955(Burton, , 1956Kessler and Fink, 1986;Rhim et al, 1988;Singh and Creamer, 1992;Browning et al, 2001;Popov-Raljic  et al, 2008). The increased rate of the Maillard reaction in concentrated and dried milks is due to the lower water activities and increased concentrations of reactant molecules in these products (van Boekel, 1998).…”
Section: Flavour and Colour Of Milkmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Raw milk was obtained from the Centre of Dairy Research (CEDAR), University of Reading, UK. It was processed on an APV junior UHT plate heat exchanger (APV, Crawley, UK), with two stages of heating involving hot water (80°C) and steam (112 to 142°C) as described (Browning et al 2001). A constant flow rate was used, giving a residence time of 2 s in the holding section at 110, 120, 130 and 142°C but 15 s at 85°C.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%