2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.lindif.2016.11.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting school achievement from early theory of mind: Differential effects on achievement tests and teacher ratings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
33
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
3
33
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Using data from a large-scale assessment of German students in early secondary schools, we provided evidence that social behavior has a disproportionate evidence on grades in comparison to achievement tests. Specifically these findings help reconcile differential findings from studies using only grades or achievement tests as an outcome measure (e.g., (Adams et al, 1999 ; Malecki and Elliot, 2002 ; Lockl et al, 2017 ; Gerbino et al, 2018 ). In our model, significant relationships between social behavior and both grades and early test scores, but not later test scores, remained.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using data from a large-scale assessment of German students in early secondary schools, we provided evidence that social behavior has a disproportionate evidence on grades in comparison to achievement tests. Specifically these findings help reconcile differential findings from studies using only grades or achievement tests as an outcome measure (e.g., (Adams et al, 1999 ; Malecki and Elliot, 2002 ; Lockl et al, 2017 ; Gerbino et al, 2018 ). In our model, significant relationships between social behavior and both grades and early test scores, but not later test scores, remained.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…For instance, many educators include behavior measures in their grading (Cross and Frary, 1999 ), and grades have been shown to reflect numerous personality factors in addition to academic competence (Borghans et al, 2011 ; Andrei et al, 2015 ; Lechner et al, 2017 ; Gerbino et al, 2018 ). For example, Lockl et al ( 2017 ) found that theory of mind in kindergarten predicted grades in grade 1 and 2, but they did not examine any connection to achievement test scores. Moreover, theory of mind represents a specific aspect of social development, and more research examining peer problems and prosocial behavior is needed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the present results also showed that those who scored higher on ToM and empathy may also experience greater feelings of guilt and shame (Leece et al, 2017;Lockl et al, 2017). Such findings support studies that suggest being skilled in understanding the perspectives and emotions of others may in part hinder one's private emotion knowledge in that it may reduce one's awareness and attention to the emotional self (Leary & Guadagno, 2011).…”
Section: Relations Among Tom Emotion Knowledge and School Engagementsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Social-emotional skills such as perspective taking and empathy are especially important for the development of school engagement, memory and academic achievement, and prosocial relations (Ahmed et al, 2018;Estevez et al, 2018;Ross & Tolan, 2017;Zorza et al, 2018). Although past studies have found positive associations among younger children's ToM, memory, and school success (Lecece et al, 2017;Lockl et al, 2017), and social relations (Feldman et al, 2014;Fink et al, 2015;Lecce et al, 2017), few studies explore relations among ToM, empathy, and school engagement in emerging adolescents. That is, to the best of our knowledge, there remains a lack of studies on the connections among ToM and related social-emotional skills, emotion knowledge, and school success in young adolescents (Campbell et al, 2018;Moore-McBride et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, previous studies investigating the link between ToM and reading comprehension have shown mixed results. Whereas some have reported significant direct effects of ToM on reading comprehension, even after accounting for language skills and listening comprehension (Atkinson et al, 2017;Boerma et al, 2017), others have not found direct links after considering language skills or listening comprehension (Guajardo and Cartwright, 2016;Kim, 2017;Ebert, 2020) or they have found no correlations at all (Lockl et al, 2017). However, there is evidence that suggests that, particularly beyond the preschool years, when more advanced measures of reading and more advanced measures of ToM such as higher-order mental reasoning or the reference to mental states in more complex situations are assessed, ToM is related to reading comprehension (Boerma et al, 2017;Florit et al, 2020).…”
Section: Theory Of Mind (Tom)mentioning
confidence: 96%