2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-29911-8_43
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting Scientific Impact via Heterogeneous Academic Network Embedding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, an academic network is heterogeneous and is composed of various different kinds of networks, such as co-author network, paper citation network and venuepaper network [2,13]. The graph-based models including univariate and multivariate random walk techniques are widely used to predict future impact of papers [3,[9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In fact, an academic network is heterogeneous and is composed of various different kinds of networks, such as co-author network, paper citation network and venuepaper network [2,13]. The graph-based models including univariate and multivariate random walk techniques are widely used to predict future impact of papers [3,[9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Paper citation network with text information (PCNT) [13]. Let P , Z, W respectively represent the sets of papers, their topics and words, E pp , E pz and E pw are the sets of edges between papers and their references, topics, words, E zw is the set of edges between topics and words, respectively.…”
Section: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…e existing studies for the research team formation concentrated on synergies between scholars [7][8][9][10]. To predict the synergies, analyzing or embedding bibliographic networks has recently been the most popular approach [11,12]. ese studies searched for adequate collaboration partners of each scholar by analyzing his/her research history.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%