“…Actually such a 'uniform' co-variation between two cues has also been associated in studies about the phonetic realisation of segmental phonological oppositions with 'clear speech' (concomitant strengthening) (Uchanski, 2005;Ferguson & Kewley-Port, 2007) and reduction processes (concomitant weakening) phenomena (van Son & Pols, 1999;Mooshammer & Geng, 2008), and related to prosodic strengthening (Cho, 2005;Cole, Kim, Choi, & Hasegawa-Johnson, 2007), mostly interpreted within the hypoarticulation and hyper-articulation (H&H) theory framework (Lindblom, 1990). In a previous study (Baqué, 2015;Marczyk & Baqué, 2015) involving the same patients, we observed that some segmental phonological contrasts in vowel and consonant productions were enhanced under stress and reduced in unstressed syllables and interpreted these results as possibly related to an H&H phenomena. Thus, further, more focused analyses are needed in order to identify the main factors underlying intensity and duration co-variation in stress contrast marking in conduction aphasics' speech and to determine the extent to which the observed acoustic differences result from a subtle phonetic impairment or are related to speech style and/or monitoring effects (e.g.…”