2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2019.104408
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting soil aggregate stability using readily available soil properties and machine learning techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
2
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it can be determined that soil properties contribute significantly to predicting MWD, specifically organic matter. This can be supported by previous studies, which showed the high correlation between OM and SAS (Abiven et al, 2009;Chaplot and Cooper, 2015) and that OM represents a significant contributor in the prediction of MWD (Bieganowski et al, 2018;Rivera and Bonilla, 2020). Also, Annabi et al (2017) reported the significant weight of clays in the pedotransfer-function of MWDfw, which confirms the current study's results on the contribution of clay in the prediction of different SAS tests.…”
Section: Determining the Relative Importance Of Variablessupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, it can be determined that soil properties contribute significantly to predicting MWD, specifically organic matter. This can be supported by previous studies, which showed the high correlation between OM and SAS (Abiven et al, 2009;Chaplot and Cooper, 2015) and that OM represents a significant contributor in the prediction of MWD (Bieganowski et al, 2018;Rivera and Bonilla, 2020). Also, Annabi et al (2017) reported the significant weight of clays in the pedotransfer-function of MWDfw, which confirms the current study's results on the contribution of clay in the prediction of different SAS tests.…”
Section: Determining the Relative Importance Of Variablessupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Overall, this technique achieves its effectiveness due to the availability of many important factors, such as the significant progress of machine learning algorithms and their widespread applications in several fields (Wadoux et al, 2020), including soil science, and their contribution to the prediction and mapping of different continuous soil propreties such as organic carbon (Lamichhane et al, 2019), soil plasticity (Al Masmoudi et al, 2021), soil aggregate stability (Rivera and Bonilla, 2020;Bouslihim et al, 2021) and texture (Barman and Choudhury, 2020). It is also involved in the prediction of discontinuous soil characteristics such as soil classes and soil horizons (Zeraatpisheh et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the process of land reclamation, it is important to select optimal management strategies to create not only the desired vegetation cover, but also to promote the preservation of macroaggregate structure in soils to improve long-term nutrient supply and physical properties of the soil (Klimkina et al, 2018;Wick et al, 2009Wick et al, , 2016. Aggregation processes in soil are the result of interaction of a number of physical, chemical and biological factors with the complex feedback mechanisms (Oades and Waters, 1991;Rivera and Bonilla, 2020;Sodhi et al, 2009). The soil aggregation is considered as a process regulated by the biota (Duchicela et al, 2013;Rillig and Mummey, 2006;Tisdall and Oades, 1982).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the K sat measurements, the samples were analyzed for soil bulk density, particle density (Blake & Hartge, 1986), texture (Day, 1965), and water holding capacity as described in Burt (2004). Also, undisturbed soil samples were taken at each sampling point from the top 5 soil cm and used to estimate aggregates stability using a wet sieving apparatus (Eijkelkamp ®) following the methodology described by Kemper & Rosenau (1986) and the adaptation described in Rivera & Bonilla (2020) for the Eijkelkamp wet sieving apparatus.…”
Section: Soil Sampling and Laboratory Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%