2022
DOI: 10.1071/wr21018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting spatial and seasonal patterns of wildlife–vehicle collisions in high-risk areas

Abstract: Context Vehicle collisions with wildlife can injure or kill animals, threaten human safety, and threaten the viability of rare species. This has led to a focus in road-ecology research on identifying the key predictors of ‘road-kill’ risk, with the goal of guiding management to mitigate its impact. However, because of the complex and context-dependent nature of the causes of risk exposure, modelling road-kill data in ways that yield consistent recommendations has proven challenging. Aim Here we used a mult… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This underestimation can be ascribed to various factors such as scavenger activity [ 82 , 83 , 84 ], post-accident mortality of injured individuals [ 68 ], the influence of weather conditions [ 85 ], road type [ 86 ], and detectability, which can be influenced by carcass size [ 87 ], the amount of roadside vegetation [ 88 ], displacement by traffic [ 89 ], and survey method [ 88 ]. Regarding survey methodology, our decision to employ a vehicle and adopt a cautious, low-speed driving approach to enhance roadkill detection, though a widely acknowledged sampling method for studying road mortality in reptiles, amphibians, and vertebrates in general [ 90 , 91 , 92 ], has been previously highlighted for potential underestimation up to 12–16 times less than the actual recorded roadkill count [ 93 ]. This might explain the reduced efficiency in detecting smaller herpetofauna species in the study area.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This underestimation can be ascribed to various factors such as scavenger activity [ 82 , 83 , 84 ], post-accident mortality of injured individuals [ 68 ], the influence of weather conditions [ 85 ], road type [ 86 ], and detectability, which can be influenced by carcass size [ 87 ], the amount of roadside vegetation [ 88 ], displacement by traffic [ 89 ], and survey method [ 88 ]. Regarding survey methodology, our decision to employ a vehicle and adopt a cautious, low-speed driving approach to enhance roadkill detection, though a widely acknowledged sampling method for studying road mortality in reptiles, amphibians, and vertebrates in general [ 90 , 91 , 92 ], has been previously highlighted for potential underestimation up to 12–16 times less than the actual recorded roadkill count [ 93 ]. This might explain the reduced efficiency in detecting smaller herpetofauna species in the study area.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To understand factors associated with aridland vertebrate roadkill (here, DOR counts per survey) in the wildland–urban interface, we ran generalized additive models (GAMs) with negative binomial distributions in the R package mgcv [ 81 ]. We used GAMs owing to anticipated nonlinear effects of certain covariates on taxa [ 41 , 43 , 82 , 83 ]. Predictors included mean values for environmental recency (i.e.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Environmental factors, such as climate, development, traffic and luminosity, are associated with road mortality [37][38][39][40][41]. Roadkill rates can also vary temporally by diel and seasonal activity periods [42,43]. Many herpetofauna and small mammals, for example, employ nocturnal activity strategies to evade the heat of the day in desert climates [38,44]; herpetofauna often use roads for thermoregulation after the sun sets [34,35,45].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%