2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2014.10.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting Stroke Outcome Using Clinical- versus Imaging-based Scoring System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clinical rating or imaging - based scoring systems like ASTRAL, DRAGON or SEDAN have been published to predict loss of functional independence after IS [ 2 5 ]. Age, initial stroke severity, onset to admission time, range of visual fields, level of consciousness, glucose and concentrations of serum neutrophil markers were some predictors for losing functional independence in these studies [ 6 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical rating or imaging - based scoring systems like ASTRAL, DRAGON or SEDAN have been published to predict loss of functional independence after IS [ 2 5 ]. Age, initial stroke severity, onset to admission time, range of visual fields, level of consciousness, glucose and concentrations of serum neutrophil markers were some predictors for losing functional independence in these studies [ 6 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 The score can also be used as a patient comparative tool between studies or as a surrogate imaging marker in prognostic studies. 15 The higher the ASPECTS, the better the prognosis. 1 Considered in this fashion, the reliability of ASPECTS has been measured with ICCs, a method that will take into account any degree of proximity between 2 scores attributed to the same patient.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[24913] The results of our study show that patients with a DRAGON score of 7–8 had significantly worse clinical outcomes (mRS ≥4) and higher mortality compared to patients with DRAGON scores ≤6. This demonstrates that the DRAGON score can predict patient clinical outcomes after treatment with IV tPA and endovascular therapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…[24913] Our study results show that the DRAGON score can in fact be applied to endovascular patients who have already received IV tPA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%