2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10758-017-9334-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting Student Success: A Naïve Bayesian Application to Community College Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A review of previous research that aimed to predict academic achievement indicates that researchers have applied a range of machine learning algorithms, including multiple, probit and logistic regression, neural networks, and C4.5 and J48 decision trees. However, random forests (Zabriskie et al, 2019), genetic programming (Xing et al, 2015), and Naive Bayes algorithms (Ornelas & Ordonez, 2017) were used in recent studies. The prediction accuracy of these models reaches very high levels.…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A review of previous research that aimed to predict academic achievement indicates that researchers have applied a range of machine learning algorithms, including multiple, probit and logistic regression, neural networks, and C4.5 and J48 decision trees. However, random forests (Zabriskie et al, 2019), genetic programming (Xing et al, 2015), and Naive Bayes algorithms (Ornelas & Ordonez, 2017) were used in recent studies. The prediction accuracy of these models reaches very high levels.…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the high end of the scale, there are tools tested with several thousand students. Two studies stand out above the rest in terms of population size: Ornelas and Ordonez had data of 8658 students belonging to 13 different courses [10], while Waddington and Nam collected data regarding 8762 students across 10 semesters [27]. On the other hand, the system presented by Chen was tested on a class of only 38 students [21], while Akcapinar et al included only 90 students in their study [36], which can be regarded as insufficient in order to make a solid evaluation of a predictor's performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ornelas and Ordonez developed a Naïve Bayesian classifier that was applied in 13 different courses at Rio Salado Community College (Tempe, AZ, USA) [10]. The courses belonged to degree programs in the fields of science and humanities.…”
Section: Predictorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models achieve remarkably high levels of prediction accuracy. To accurately predict the academic achievement of students, a thorough comprehension of the variables and characteristics influencing student outcomes is essential in (Ornelas & Ordonez 2017). In this study (Alshanqiti & Namoun 2020), they analysed 357 articles focusing on student performance and examining the effects of 29 different features.…”
Section: Review On Machine Learning Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%