2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.02.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting survival in patients with advanced disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
165
2
8

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 233 publications
(179 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
4
165
2
8
Order By: Relevance
“…26 Despite the significant association between serum CRP concentrations and odds of death in the present study, results of ROC curve analysis indicated that the discriminative ability of CRP concentration alone in predicting outcome was only moderately accurate. This is in accordance with findings of several oth-er clinical studies 27,[38][39][40] that indicated circulating CRP concentration alone does not correspond to outcome.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…26 Despite the significant association between serum CRP concentrations and odds of death in the present study, results of ROC curve analysis indicated that the discriminative ability of CRP concentration alone in predicting outcome was only moderately accurate. This is in accordance with findings of several oth-er clinical studies 27,[38][39][40] that indicated circulating CRP concentration alone does not correspond to outcome.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Greater predictive accuracy in patients closer to dying has been called the ''horizon effect'' and has not been studied extensively, but data suggest that because clinicians in general tend to be overoptimistic, the longer the predicted survival and the shorter the observed survival, the less accurate predictions will tend to be. 4 The overall average accuracy of these predictions, 58%, is in line with prior studies of clinician prediction of survival. For example, a meta-analysis of eight studies comparing predicted and actual survival in patients with advanced cancer, which found that clinician predictions were correct to within 1 week in 25% of cases, correct to within 2 weeks in 43%, and correct to within 4 weeks in 61%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Most studies ask clinicians to predict survival in days and compare the PS to the AS 4,5 , but such precise estimates are uncommon in clinical practice. Indeed, rather than predicting the number of days a patient has to live, a more common approach when talking to patients and families about predicted survival is to give a rough estimate such as ''a few months'' or a range such as ''days to weeks'' or ''weeks to months.…”
Section: Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recent studies show that low-dose computer tomography scan can be used to screen lung cancer effectively and reduce its mortality (Aberle and Brown, 2008;Coche, 2008). Secondly, comprehensive interventions including psychological intervention, dietary guidance and exercise intervention are required (Peters et al, 1995;Cunningham et al, 1998;Glare et al, 2008). Thirdly, self-management educations should be promoted for patients to improve compliance and effectiveness of the treatment, to develop good habits and to alleviate the pressure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%