2022
DOI: 10.1007/s12205-022-1918-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting the Compressive Strength and the Effective Porosity of Pervious Concrete Using Machine Learning Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, the problem is also compared with predictions from the classic ANN model and the extreme gradient boosting method (XGB) for reference. More details about the XGB method can be found in works of Le et al [27,28]. It is worth noting that XGB is considered one of the best regression machine learning methods for tabular data, as reported in recent publications [29,30].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the problem is also compared with predictions from the classic ANN model and the extreme gradient boosting method (XGB) for reference. More details about the XGB method can be found in works of Le et al [27,28]. It is worth noting that XGB is considered one of the best regression machine learning methods for tabular data, as reported in recent publications [29,30].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HYBRID MODEL In recent years, several analytical models [15] and artificial intelligence approaches [16] have been developed to predict the fundamental properties of porous concrete. In [17] a symbolic regression approach based on the genetic programming framework was utilized to assess the compressive strength of the porous concrete, achieving favorable results compared to purely analytical solutions or black-box machine learning models such as ANN and XGB [16]. However, symbolic regression models often suffer from drawbacks such as lack of physical significance and violations of fundamental physical laws.…”
Section: B Application To Pervious Concretementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth mentioning again that the Pareto front consists of optimal points that are not dominated by any other solution in both accuracy and complexity. Table III introduces the two best-fitting equations obtained on the corresponding Pareto fronts, and the correlation coefficients with the two constructed datasets, and the independent validation dataset in [16]. It is apparent that the GP formula is slightly better than the hybrid model on the constructed dataset and displays no difference on the independent dataset.…”
Section: B Application To Pervious Concretementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The permeability was also affected by the pore characteristics, such as pore size and pore composition. [26][27][28][29] Therefore, there is a theoretical method to enhance the permeability and strength of pervious concrete by optimizing the pore structure. By this method, the pervious concrete gains a reduced porosity (improve strength) and optimized pore structure (maintain/improve permeability).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The previous research had found that porosity was not the only factor influencing permeability of pervious concrete. The permeability was also affected by the pore characteristics, such as pore size and pore composition 26–29 . Therefore, there is a theoretical method to enhance the permeability and strength of pervious concrete by optimizing the pore structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%