2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.111470
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting the consequences of accidents involving dangerous substances using machine learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results indicate the efficiency of supervised ML approaches in predicting the accident outcome. The accuracy of our models shows superior performance to the existing studies in predicting accident consequences in the petroleum industry (Balasubramanian and Thangamani 41 ) accuracy of 0.92 using random forest and stochastic gradient descent (SGD), Kurian et al 42 achieved an accuracy of 0.948 using linear SVC RF for environmental consequences class, Chebila 45 highest accuracy achieved by RF 0.792 for human consequences class. Our Xgboost model has achieved 100% precision for near‐miss and catastrophic accident types of accidents, and MLP has achieved 100% precision for catastrophic accidents.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…These results indicate the efficiency of supervised ML approaches in predicting the accident outcome. The accuracy of our models shows superior performance to the existing studies in predicting accident consequences in the petroleum industry (Balasubramanian and Thangamani 41 ) accuracy of 0.92 using random forest and stochastic gradient descent (SGD), Kurian et al 42 achieved an accuracy of 0.948 using linear SVC RF for environmental consequences class, Chebila 45 highest accuracy achieved by RF 0.792 for human consequences class. Our Xgboost model has achieved 100% precision for near‐miss and catastrophic accident types of accidents, and MLP has achieved 100% precision for catastrophic accidents.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…After performing an initial analysis using these ML techniques the overall metrics were not satisfactory, and then we used the smart grid parameter tuning method for finding the best parameters to get optimum performance of the models. 41,42,45 After measuring the predictive power of ML algorithms, we have used RST to explore the patterns behind the accident occurrence. The RST helps to understand the indiscernibility relationships between the given attributes under uncertain conditions even with noisy data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations