2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting the degree of reaction of supplementary cementitious materials in cementitious pastes using a pozzolanic test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…After heating to 400 • C, specimens increased by 0.3% (control mix), 4.5% (S1-HSC), 5.2% (S2-HSC), 5.9% (S2-S3-HSC), and 10.4% (S1-S2-S3-HSC), respectively. This could be attributed to the fact that the water result in the decomposition of hydration products lets to rehydrate the anhydrous cement, increases the amount of C-S-H gel and improves the strength of the concrete at 400 • C [12,15,18,20,21,36]. The second stage (400-1000 • C) was characterized by a loss of residual compressive strength of concrete.…”
Section: Mechanical Properties Subjected To Elevated Temperaturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After heating to 400 • C, specimens increased by 0.3% (control mix), 4.5% (S1-HSC), 5.2% (S2-HSC), 5.9% (S2-S3-HSC), and 10.4% (S1-S2-S3-HSC), respectively. This could be attributed to the fact that the water result in the decomposition of hydration products lets to rehydrate the anhydrous cement, increases the amount of C-S-H gel and improves the strength of the concrete at 400 • C [12,15,18,20,21,36]. The second stage (400-1000 • C) was characterized by a loss of residual compressive strength of concrete.…”
Section: Mechanical Properties Subjected To Elevated Temperaturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They used the same calorimetric test, but the best correlation between 28d compressive strength and heat development was reach for 3 and 7 d of calorimetric measures. Other studies used a similar test design to determine hydraulic or pozzolanic properties of different materials, including GGBS [26][27][28]. However, it was never attempted to use the R3 test to rank different GGBS according to their early age reactivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various scientists were investigating the question of a test method suitable for assessing the pozzolanic reactivity of different SCM directly from the respective SCM [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. Another approach is the determination of the reaction degree of SCM in cementitious systems [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. Different parameters such as the reactive silica content, the CaO or Ca(OH) 2 consumption, the relative strength index or the content of soluble silicon (Si) and aluminum (Al) ions in alkaline solution are common to assess the pozzolanic reactivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%