2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.11.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting the diagnosis of HIV and sexually transmitted infections among men who have sex with men using machine learning approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
42
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
3
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We extracted routinely collected data from the EHR, including self-reported questions at the first visit for each visit interval (described below). The feature selection was informed by the literature review, expert opinion, and previous work [ 25 ]. This baseline predictor data for modelling included gender, age (≥18 years old), country of birth, sexual practices (e.g., had sex with a sex partner in the last 12 months, number of sex partners in the last 12 months), condom use with sex partners in the last 12 months, pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use, presenting with STI symptoms, living with HIV (for STI prediction), and reported sexual contact with partners with an STI (gonorrhoea, chlamydia, or syphilis) (summarised in Table 1 and Table S2 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We extracted routinely collected data from the EHR, including self-reported questions at the first visit for each visit interval (described below). The feature selection was informed by the literature review, expert opinion, and previous work [ 25 ]. This baseline predictor data for modelling included gender, age (≥18 years old), country of birth, sexual practices (e.g., had sex with a sex partner in the last 12 months, number of sex partners in the last 12 months), condom use with sex partners in the last 12 months, pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use, presenting with STI symptoms, living with HIV (for STI prediction), and reported sexual contact with partners with an STI (gonorrhoea, chlamydia, or syphilis) (summarised in Table 1 and Table S2 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Denmark, Ahlstrom et al ( 36 ) applied various machine learning methods in electronic registry data to predict HIV status and found that the RF algorithm also performed slightly better (AUC = 0.89). More recently, Bao et al ( 37 ) developed four machine learning models and evaluated their performance in predicting HIV diagnosis based on a cohort of MSM in Australia, and he proposed that Machine learning approaches outperformed the multivariable logistic regression model, with the gradient boosting machine achieving the highest performance (AUC = 0.76). Our study complements these machine learning studies applied to HIV infection prediction, all of which effectively illustrate that machine learning can be used as an effective method for detecting HIV infection among MSM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the CV and grid search technique to evaluate and optimise the model hyperparameters to avoid overfitting and improve generalizability. The model and hyperparameters with the largest AUC in internal tenfold cross-validation and grid search were selected as the training outer-loop model and tested on the threefold outer-loop test fold 38 , 39 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%