1998
DOI: 10.1007/s100219900029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting the Effects of Atmospheric Nitrogen Deposition in Conifer Stands: Evidence from the NITREX Ecosystem-Scale Experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

8
80
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
8
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…H umans have increased the amount of reactive N on earth (1), leading to negative environmental consequences that include reduced forest growth and eutrophication of surface waters (2). In contrast to Europe, where anthropogenic N deposition is generally greater, the consequences in northeastern North American forests are less clear because there has been little obvious evidence of forest eutrophication.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…H umans have increased the amount of reactive N on earth (1), leading to negative environmental consequences that include reduced forest growth and eutrophication of surface waters (2). In contrast to Europe, where anthropogenic N deposition is generally greater, the consequences in northeastern North American forests are less clear because there has been little obvious evidence of forest eutrophication.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A great number of studies on N deposition have been carried out in Europe and North America, where industrial development occur earliest (Matson et al, 1999;Galloway et al, 2003). Results have shown that in predominately N-limited temperate forests in these regions, the experimental and atmospheric N inputs had dramatically altered ecosystem processes and properties, including forest productivity, soil fertility, species composition, litter decomposition, and N loss from soils to groundwater and atmosphere Kahl et al, 1993;Magill et al, 1996Magill et al, , 2000Magill et al, , 2004Emmett et al, 1998;Fenn et al, 1998;Gundersen, 1998;Gundersen et al, 1998Gundersen et al, , 2006Hall and Matson, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The higher nitrate leaching at Speuld was caused by lower C/N ratio of organic layer (21, as compared to 25 in the roof control plot) combined with higher N deposition (44 kg ha -1 yr -1 ). The lower C/N ratio indicates more active nitrification as well as lower retention capacity of the soil for deposited and internally generated nitrate (Emmett et al 1998b).…”
Section: Leachingmentioning
confidence: 99%