2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-018-5787-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting the grade of hepatocellular carcinoma based on non-contrast-enhanced MRI radiomics signature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
109
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
109
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, Wu et al applied the traditional machine learning with radiomics features for differentiation of high‐ and low‐grade HCCs and reported that the radiomics signatures based on T1 weighted MR and T2 weighted MR yielded AUC values of 72.48% and 73.6% for discriminating high‐grade and low‐grade HCCs, respectively . The performance of the conventional radiomics feature has also been assessed and compared with deep features with respect to multiple b‐value images, the log maps and the ADC map for HCC grading.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, Wu et al applied the traditional machine learning with radiomics features for differentiation of high‐ and low‐grade HCCs and reported that the radiomics signatures based on T1 weighted MR and T2 weighted MR yielded AUC values of 72.48% and 73.6% for discriminating high‐grade and low‐grade HCCs, respectively . The performance of the conventional radiomics feature has also been assessed and compared with deep features with respect to multiple b‐value images, the log maps and the ADC map for HCC grading.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Wu et al applied the traditional machine learning with radiomics features for differentiation of high-and low-grade HCCs and reported that the radiomics signatures based on T1 weighted MR and T2 weighted MR yielded AUC values of 72.48% and 73.6% for discriminating highgrade and low-grade HCCs, respectively. 47 The performance of the conventional radiomics feature has also been assessed and compared with deep features with respect to multiple bvalue images, the log maps and the ADC map for HCC grading. Generally, it is difficult to conduct a fair comparison between deep features and the radiomics feature for HCC grading as the approaches of feature extraction and the mechanism of classifiers are remarkably different between the deep learning approach and the radiomics approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diagnostic performance of non‐DWI‐related techniques differed among different studies. Wu et al found that a radiomics analysis based on MRI had the potential to discriminate HCCs with a high ES grade with an AUROC of 0.742 to 0.8. Chen et al found that the MRI perfusion parameter K trans had the best diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for distinguishing HCCs with a high grade (93.3% and 63.2%, respectively), with an AUROC of 0.78.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This research approach utilises high-throughput extraction of feature data from radiographic images, 12 and can potentially develop models to predict lesion phenotypes and prognosis in a non-invasive manner. 13,14 To our knowledge, there are relatively limited radiomics analysis data about prognosis estimation in HCC, with most of the radiomics models established on the basis of computed tomography (CT) images, [15][16][17][18][19] and only a few studies investigating the role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), [20][21][22][23] especially contrast-enhanced MRI. Moreover, previous MRI-based radiomics analyses of patients with HCC were based on a few MRI sequences from small-sample studies, and no MRI-based radiomics model for long-term survival prediction in HCC is currently available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%