2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2022.111265
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting the hip joint centre in children: New regression equations, linear scaling, and statistical shape modelling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, using the pediatric statistical shape model decreased the error in hip joint center prediction compared with linear scaling and regression analysis. 52 Using the same data set, we found that the Euclidian distance error in hip joint center was, on average, 3 mm for the statistical shape model, 5.45 mm using the linear scaling method, and 6.24 mm when using regression equations. Our pediatric statistical shape model had lower error than our adult shape model, 53 which was not unexpected given the variance of pediatric bone morphology compared to an adult cohort.…”
Section: Predicting Pediatric Bone Morphology Using Partial Least Squ...mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Additionally, using the pediatric statistical shape model decreased the error in hip joint center prediction compared with linear scaling and regression analysis. 52 Using the same data set, we found that the Euclidian distance error in hip joint center was, on average, 3 mm for the statistical shape model, 5.45 mm using the linear scaling method, and 6.24 mm when using regression equations. Our pediatric statistical shape model had lower error than our adult shape model, 53 which was not unexpected given the variance of pediatric bone morphology compared to an adult cohort.…”
Section: Predicting Pediatric Bone Morphology Using Partial Least Squ...mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…This was performed by manual selection of nodes from only the template mesh for the femoral head and neck to form a point cloud for geometric fitting. Fitting a sphere to the femoral head is a common method for accurate determination of the femoral head centre [71], [82], [170]. Cylinder fitting of the femoral neck is less common as often 3d geometry is not used for measurement, however this was determined to be the best approach from both manual inspection of the proximal femoral axis and existing literature [171], [172].…”
Section: Angular and Torsional Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following chapter is published as "Predicting the hip joint centre in children: New regression equations, linear scaling, and statistical shape modelling" in the Journal of Biomechanics (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2022.111265). Authored by Laura Carman, Thor Besier, and Julie Choisne [170].…”
Section: Chapter 5 -Predicting the Hip Joint Centre In Childrenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The knee and ankle joint centers can be estimated using functional methods or as the midpoint between the medial and lateral femoral condyles and malleoli 18,21 . Linear scaling of the pelvis can be improved by incorporating hip joint center (HJC) estimations 22,23 , but these HJC locations are difficult to estimate because they cannot be directly identified from surface marker locations. The HJC locations are commonly estimated using either functional estimation methods or regression equations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%