2009
DOI: 10.1021/ic901444c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting the Cis−Trans Dichloro Configuration of Group 15−16 Chelated Ruthenium Olefin Metathesis Complexes: A DFT and Experimental Study

Abstract: Gradient-corrected (BP86) and hybrid (M06-L) density functional calculations were used to study the relative stability of cis and trans-dichloro X-chelated benzylidene ruthenium complexes (X = O, S, Se, N, P). Calculations in the gas phase differed from experimental results, predicting the trans-dichloro configuration as being more stable in every case. The addition of Poisson-Boltzmann (PBF) continuum approximation (dichloromethane) corrected the disagreement and afforded energies consistent with experimental… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

6
76
1
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
6
76
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is in agreement with previous calculations, [11,29] which indicate that strong s donors stabilize the trans isomer. [11] Nevertheless, our more extended analysis surprisingly indicates that the energy barrier for the trans to cis isomerization, around 28 kcal mol À1 in systems 6-10, is scarcely affected by this strong change in the relative stability of the cis and trans isomers. We also explored the impact of electron-donating (OMe) or -withdrawing (NO 2 ) substituents on the phenoxy moiety.…”
supporting
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This result is in agreement with previous calculations, [11,29] which indicate that strong s donors stabilize the trans isomer. [11] Nevertheless, our more extended analysis surprisingly indicates that the energy barrier for the trans to cis isomerization, around 28 kcal mol À1 in systems 6-10, is scarcely affected by this strong change in the relative stability of the cis and trans isomers. We also explored the impact of electron-donating (OMe) or -withdrawing (NO 2 ) substituents on the phenoxy moiety.…”
supporting
confidence: 94%
“…Lemcoff and co-workers investigated the effect of stronger s donors as chelating atoms, which were shown to stabilize the cis isomer. [11] As for the mechanism of isomerization, which involves the exchange of two equatorial ligands in a square-pyramidal complex with the Ru=CHR bond in the axial position, the dissociative and the concerted pathways shown in Scheme 2 are usually invoked. Preliminary DFT calculations suggested that the dissociative pathway is viable, although the concerted pathway was not investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, pre-initiators 6 and 7 gave poly9 with M n s of 62000 (PDI = 1.2) and 1.4). These results suggest that the trans isomers are in toluene energetically more favorable than in dichloromethane, which is in accordance with literature [26][27][28] and with calculations [15]. Further, it is quite obvious that the trans isomer is formed rapidly and is readily extracted from the chemical balance by entering the polymerization cycle.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…As it is known, that the position of the cis-trans dichloro isomerization equilibrium is influenced by the nature of the solvent (high dielectric constant solvents favor the cis isomer) [26][27][28], we conducted a further test series in toluene, at that time at 80°C. Assumedly, 80°C is a temperature high enough to cancel out the influence of the energy for dissociation of the Ru-halogen bond and the initiation efficacy should be only dependent on the chemical balance of the isomerization reaction [13].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For that purpose latent catalysts/initiators have been developed [6]. A successful design motif for latent catalysts/initiators is the use of a chelating carbene ligand similar to the one used in Hoveyda type complexes with strongly coordinating co-ligands using O [7], N [8], S [9] and Se [10] donor atoms as the second binding unit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%