2020
DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.20-0546
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting the Impact of COVID-19 and the Potential Impact of the Public Health Response on Disease Burden in Uganda

Abstract: The COVID-19 pandemic and public health "lockdown" responses in sub-Saharan Africa, including Uganda, are now widely reported. Although the impact of COVID-19 on African populations has been relatively light, it is feared that redirecting focus and prioritization of health systems to fight COVID-19 may have an impact on access to non-COVID-19 diseases. We applied age-based COVID-19 mortality data from China to the population structures of Uganda and non-African countries with previously established outbreaks, … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

9
118
1
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
9
118
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…28 Estimates of mortality in Uganda follow a similar trend, with a lower predicted disease burden than the comparator regions (Europe, America and China) and the majority of risk arising indirectly due to disruptions to the health service. 29 Other studies have also reported a differential risk of severe disease in African settings compared with European countries due to underlying health conditions although there is considerable uncertainty in these analyses. 30,31…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28 Estimates of mortality in Uganda follow a similar trend, with a lower predicted disease burden than the comparator regions (Europe, America and China) and the majority of risk arising indirectly due to disruptions to the health service. 29 Other studies have also reported a differential risk of severe disease in African settings compared with European countries due to underlying health conditions although there is considerable uncertainty in these analyses. 30,31…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The so-called “Africa paradox” has been the focus of several editorials in prominent journals, 9 10 11 12 13 proposing several explanatory theories. These include that exposure to other coronaviruses has induced cross reactive herd immunity, 14 that the younger age structure of African populations allows its populations to tolerate covid-19 better, 15 that experience gained during the Ebola crisis allowed public health agencies across Africa to contain covid-19 better, 16 and that certain live attenuated vaccines (BCG vaccine, oral polio vaccine, and measles vaccines) engendered robust non-specific innate immune responses that also protect against covid-19. 17 18 19 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6][7][8] The so-called 'Africa paradox' has been the focus of a number of editorials in prominent journals [9][10][11][12][13] proposing several explanatory theories. These include: 1) exposure to non-CV19 coronaviruses has induced cross-reactive herd immunity; 14 2) the younger age structure of African populations allows its populations to better tolerate CV19; 15 3) experience gained during the Ebola crisis allowed public health agencies across Africa to better contain CV19; 16 and 4) that certain live attenuated vaccines -Bacille Calmette Guerin (BCG) vaccine, the oral polio vaccine and measles vaccines -engendered robust non-specific innate immune responses that also protect against CV19. [17][18][19] We postulate a more mundane explanation for the Africa paradox: insufficient data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%