2023
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2301.02231
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting the impact of feedback on matter clustering with machine learning in CAMELS

Abstract: Extracting information from the total matter power spectrum with the precision needed for upcoming large cosmological surveys requires unraveling the complex effects of galaxy formation processes on the distribution of matter. In this work, we investigate the impact of baryonic physics on matter clustering at 𝑧 = 0 using a large library of power spectra from the Cosmology and Astrophysics with MachinE Learning Simulations (CAMELS) project, containing thousands of (25 ℎ −1 Mpc) 3 volume realizations with varyi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, most of these approaches focus on larger scales (R 7 h −1 cMpc or < k h 1 max cMpc −1 ), due to the difficulty of capturing the complexity of clustering on strongly nonlinear scales with these approaches. 12 Smaller nonlinear scales of clustering have been found to hold more cosmological information than larger scales (Contreras et al 2023;Lange et al 2022Lange et al , 2023, and they are affected by the details of feedback and baryonic physics (seen acutely in the CAMELS matter power spectra in Delgado et al 2023). Within the HOD framework and even for the thoroughly studied power spectrum, the chosen prescription for the nonlinear regime strongly affects measured cosmological parameters (e.g., a 5σ bias for a Euclid-like survey; Safi & Farhang 2021); this motivates approaches that inherently reproduce small-scale galaxy clustering while also incorporating baryonic effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, most of these approaches focus on larger scales (R 7 h −1 cMpc or < k h 1 max cMpc −1 ), due to the difficulty of capturing the complexity of clustering on strongly nonlinear scales with these approaches. 12 Smaller nonlinear scales of clustering have been found to hold more cosmological information than larger scales (Contreras et al 2023;Lange et al 2022Lange et al , 2023, and they are affected by the details of feedback and baryonic physics (seen acutely in the CAMELS matter power spectra in Delgado et al 2023). Within the HOD framework and even for the thoroughly studied power spectrum, the chosen prescription for the nonlinear regime strongly affects measured cosmological parameters (e.g., a 5σ bias for a Euclid-like survey; Safi & Farhang 2021); this motivates approaches that inherently reproduce small-scale galaxy clustering while also incorporating baryonic effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machine learning enables the study of the galaxy-halo connection using nearly any type of galaxy property or feature, in particular those for which relationships are very hard to formulate or model (e.g., Jo et al 2023;Shao et al 2023c;Delgado et al 2023;Rodrigues et al 2023). Machine learning also avoids some of the limitations of "classical" methods, and it notably has the ability to find constraints with fewer samples or over a larger parameter space than a Fisher formalism or a covariance matrix use de Santi & Abramo 2022) as well as for summary statistics for which theoretical descriptions and likelihoods do not exist (Makinen et al 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%