2022
DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.926927
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting the Lung Adenocarcinoma and Its Biomarkers by Integrating Gene Expression and DNA Methylation Data

Abstract: The early symptoms of lung adenocarcinoma patients are inapparent, and the clinical diagnosis of lung adenocarcinoma is primarily through X-ray examination and pathological section examination, whereas the discovery of biomarkers points out another direction for the diagnosis of lung adenocarcinoma with the development of bioinformatics technology. However, it is not accurate and trustworthy to diagnose lung adenocarcinoma due to omics data with high-dimension and low-sample size (HDLSS) features or biomarkers… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 48 publications
(50 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent studies in bioinformatics have proposed the use of neural networks in molecular classification of diseases by gene expression and multi-omics data (Qiu et al 2022 ; Shao et al 2021 ). Many studies were focused on the comparison between artificial neuronal network and other machine learning methods, demonstrating that artificial neural networks are more flexible and work on different types of data (e.g., discrete or continuous data) (Esteva et al 2019 ; Biganzoli et al 1998 ; Zhu et al 2020b ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies in bioinformatics have proposed the use of neural networks in molecular classification of diseases by gene expression and multi-omics data (Qiu et al 2022 ; Shao et al 2021 ). Many studies were focused on the comparison between artificial neuronal network and other machine learning methods, demonstrating that artificial neural networks are more flexible and work on different types of data (e.g., discrete or continuous data) (Esteva et al 2019 ; Biganzoli et al 1998 ; Zhu et al 2020b ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%