2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-86976-2_29
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting the Need for Adaptive Radiotherapy in Head and Neck Patients from CT-Based Radiomics and Pre-treatment Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alves et al investigated CT-based radiomics for electively scheduling adaptive radiotherapy, but only considered radiomic features from the gross tumor volume (GTV), and did not include dose metrics as part of the model. 29 Yu et al achieved high AUCs to predict adaptive radiotherapy eligibility,however,they used magnetic resonance-based radiomics features in a cohort of nasopharyngeal cancer patients. 11 We performed the first study to use radiomics from the primary tumor, nodal volumes, and parotid glands for the prediction of replanning for patients with OPC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Alves et al investigated CT-based radiomics for electively scheduling adaptive radiotherapy, but only considered radiomic features from the gross tumor volume (GTV), and did not include dose metrics as part of the model. 29 Yu et al achieved high AUCs to predict adaptive radiotherapy eligibility,however,they used magnetic resonance-based radiomics features in a cohort of nasopharyngeal cancer patients. 11 We performed the first study to use radiomics from the primary tumor, nodal volumes, and parotid glands for the prediction of replanning for patients with OPC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alves et al. investigated CT‐based radiomics for electively scheduling adaptive radiotherapy, but only considered radiomic features from the gross tumor volume (GTV), and did not include dose metrics as part of the model 29 . Yu et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although no statistical difference was found, this fact corroborates with other studies showing that smaller “Grey Level Non-Uniformity” values display higher uniformity and therefore suggesting that “Grey Level Non-Uniformity” represents the response to cancer treatment as regards to radiotherapy [ 51 ]. As a result, other research works have proposed the employment of CT-image “Grey Level Non-Uniformity” as a predictive marker for adaptive radiotherapy and for local failure (disease persistence or reappearance) in HN cancer patients [ 28 , 52 ]. In a similar fashion, “Kurtosis” measures the peakedness of the distribution values and the complexity of the organizational structure and tumor heterogeneity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By incorporating radiomics features derived from CT images (one before the start of radiotherapy and one during radiotherapy for boost planning) in a deep learning design, they were able to obtain efficient predictive performance (Area Under the Curve = 0.73 to 0.75). In a similar fashion, Alves et al, 2021 [ 28 ] utilized sematic features, radiomic features (extracted from contrast-enhanced CT) and a combination of the two, to discriminate between replan (ART) and control (no-ART) groups by applying an SVM classifier. Their proposed design reported a radiomic-based mean accuracy of 0.78, with the feature combination further increasing classification performance (mean accuracy = 0.82).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%