2010
DOI: 10.1167/5.8.221
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting the orientation of invisible stimuli from activity in human primary visual cortex

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

10
271
1
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 187 publications
(283 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
10
271
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The main analyses were based on ROI decoding (Haynes and Rees, 2005;Kamitani and Tong, 2005), in which the voxels of a given ROI in native space were used for classification. ROI decoding followed the same cross-validation procedure as detailed for the searchlight analysis.…”
Section: Multivariate Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main analyses were based on ROI decoding (Haynes and Rees, 2005;Kamitani and Tong, 2005), in which the voxels of a given ROI in native space were used for classification. ROI decoding followed the same cross-validation procedure as detailed for the searchlight analysis.…”
Section: Multivariate Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our motivation for extending the gene shaving method to fMRI data analysis is the inability of conventional fMRI data analysis to unravel the complex brain activity that natural sensory stimuli elicit [20]. Such complex brain activities often manifest in fMRI as spatially widely distributed and overlapping clusters of hemodynamic responses [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, do neural signals in primary sensory processing regions reflect the physical properties of the world or our conscious perception of it? Reports regarding the role of primary visual cortex in conscious vision have been mixed, with some reporting V1 responses reflect perceived reality (Kok & De Lange, 2014;Muckli et al, 2005;Murray, Boyaci, & Kersten, 2006;Watkins et al, 2006), while others report a better match with physical reality (Crick & Koch, 1995;Haynes & Rees, 2005;Mikellidou et al, 2016). However, patients suffering from blindsight (Azzopardi & Cowey, 1998;Weiskrantz, 1996) following a lesion to V1 offer compelling evidence that V1 is necessary for conscious visual perception.…”
Section: Consciousnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These predictions can be explicitly tested with laminar fMRI. For example, Haynes and Rees (2005) showed that the orientation of a grating stimulus rendered invisible by brief presentation and backward masking could be decoded from patterns of activity in V1. Interactive models of consciousness predict that information about the visually presented stimulus that does not reach awareness should not be met by top-down responses for higher-level brain areas.…”
Section: Consciousnessmentioning
confidence: 99%