2008
DOI: 10.1007/s12160-008-9071-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting the Physical Activity Intention–Behavior Profiles of Adopters and Maintainers Using Three Social Cognition Models

Abstract: The results provide useful information for intervention campaigns and demonstrate a need to consider adoption and maintenance profiles.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

8
127
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
8
127
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with research that has used an action control framework to investigate intention-behavior coupling [14,21], event categories were created based on whether or not participants intended to be active and whether or not they subsequently accumulated at least 10 min of MVPA in the 3-hour window after the EMA prompt. On occasions when participants intended to engage in PA, participants were categorized as subsequently engaging in PA (i.e., intentions followed by PA) or subsequently not engaging in PA (i.e., intentions followed by no PA).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consistent with research that has used an action control framework to investigate intention-behavior coupling [14,21], event categories were created based on whether or not participants intended to be active and whether or not they subsequently accumulated at least 10 min of MVPA in the 3-hour window after the EMA prompt. On occasions when participants intended to engage in PA, participants were categorized as subsequently engaging in PA (i.e., intentions followed by PA) or subsequently not engaging in PA (i.e., intentions followed by no PA).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research on the topic suggests that the behavioral translation of physical activity intentions is around 50% (e.g., Canadian Fitness and Lifestyle Research Institute, 2004;Rhodes & Plotnikoff, 2006). Researchers and theorists have thus postulated that (a) either additional variables other than intention explain behavior or (b) intermediary variables moderate the intentionbehavior relationship (Norman & Conner, 2005;Rhodes, Plotnikoff, & Courneya, 2008;Schwarzer, 1992;Sheeran, 2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perhaps more important, habit may have an impact on action control (i.e., translating intention into behavior). Discrepancy between initial positive intention and resulting behavior is important in the physical activity domain because most of the populace has positive intentions but at least half often fail to act (Canadian Fitness and Lifestyle Research Institute, 2004;Rhodes & Plotnikoff, 2006;Rhodes, Plotnikoff et al, 2008;Sheeran, 2002). Habitual patterns (same routine) seem apt for helping with the seamless transition of motivation to behavior without considerable deliberation and social cognition.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Negative information (from either stressing short-term consequences or emphasizing negative wordings) may potentially act as a stronger mobilizer of cognitive resources toward overcoming exercise barriers (i.e., resolve measure) than barriers preventing fruit intake. That is, exercise is considered to be a strenuous behavior that requires more cognitive control of individuals so as to better deal and cope with barriers and restraints than more mundane and lower effort behaviors (Bandura, 1989;Rhodes & de Bruijn, 2010;Rhodes, Plotnikoff, & Courneya, 2008), such as moderate-intensity physical activities and fruit intake (De Bruijn, Brug, & Van Lenthe, 2009;De Bruijn, de Groot, van den Putte, & Rhodes, 2009;Rhodes & de Bruijn, 2010). Thus, negative information may stimulate participants to believe that they need to exert more effort toward dealing and coping with barriers for exercise behaviors than for fruit consumption.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%