2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2021.102488
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting the postmortem interval of burial cadavers based on microbial community succession

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Different PMI methods are already used in the forensic routine, such as entomology and the stages of the human body decomposition, but the use of thanatomicrobiome and epinecrobiome-based estimation of PMI brings the potential for improving accuracy (Dash and Das, 2020;Roy et al, 2021). The obtained accuracy in PMI prediction for both open-air and buried human remains are really close, being able to predict within 1.82 ± 0.33 days of mean error in a 60-day period of decomposition (Zhang et al, 2021a). Hu et al (2021) identified that the appendix had a nice microorganism succession rate for human decomposition, and within a 192-hour period the mean error was of 25.79 ± 0.43 hours for PMI estimation.…”
Section: Postmortem Interval (Pmi)mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Different PMI methods are already used in the forensic routine, such as entomology and the stages of the human body decomposition, but the use of thanatomicrobiome and epinecrobiome-based estimation of PMI brings the potential for improving accuracy (Dash and Das, 2020;Roy et al, 2021). The obtained accuracy in PMI prediction for both open-air and buried human remains are really close, being able to predict within 1.82 ± 0.33 days of mean error in a 60-day period of decomposition (Zhang et al, 2021a). Hu et al (2021) identified that the appendix had a nice microorganism succession rate for human decomposition, and within a 192-hour period the mean error was of 25.79 ± 0.43 hours for PMI estimation.…”
Section: Postmortem Interval (Pmi)mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The vast majority of the studies analyze remains decomposing on the surface; however, some research has been performed in buried remains [73,74], demonstrating that microbial successional changes can be potentially utilized to estimate the PMI despite the specific environment were the corpse is decomposing.…”
Section: Thanatomicrobiomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The common use of MPS is on the near horizon as prices for consumables and the use of this equipment decreases. MPS is also seeing acceptance in other areas of non-human DNA typing such as in analyses of bacteria for post mortem interval [63,64] and now in tracking microbiomes [65,66] and was the subject of a recent review [67]. If the use of MPS is growing a profile in bacterial work, then there is every reason to expect the same acceptance and profile from eukaryotic and in particular vertebrate species.…”
Section: Conclusion On Animal Forensic Profilingmentioning
confidence: 99%