2016
DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.151364
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting the presence of bacterial pathogens in the airways of primary care patients with acute cough

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(28 reference statements)
1
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This sample was then analysed using bacterial and viral polymerase chain reaction analysis. We tested for both bacterial pathogens (Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenza, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Chlamydia pneumoniae, Bordetella pertussis, Legionella pneumoniae) and viral pathogens (rhinovirus, influenza virus, coronavirus, respiratory syncytial virus, human metapneumovirus, parainfluenza virus, adenovirus, polyomavirus, bocavirus) [11]. Samples with a pathogen present, either bacterial or viral, were referred to as confirmed infections.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This sample was then analysed using bacterial and viral polymerase chain reaction analysis. We tested for both bacterial pathogens (Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenza, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Chlamydia pneumoniae, Bordetella pertussis, Legionella pneumoniae) and viral pathogens (rhinovirus, influenza virus, coronavirus, respiratory syncytial virus, human metapneumovirus, parainfluenza virus, adenovirus, polyomavirus, bocavirus) [11]. Samples with a pathogen present, either bacterial or viral, were referred to as confirmed infections.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CRP and BUN were measured using the conventional immunoturbidimetric method. PCT was measured using a rapid sensitive assay [11]. We defined an elevated CRP, PCT, and BUN as the top 25% of measurements in our patient population (referred to as high CRP, high PCT, and high BUN, respectively).…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been demonstrated that uncertainty about the diagnosis of infection can lead to inappropriate antibiotic prescribing, overuse of resources, and disease complications [ 18 , 19 , 20 ]. With CRP as a biomarker of systematic inflammation, however, CRP-POCT enables clinicians to discern bacterial infections from other inflammatory disorders and helps them to identify the patients who benefit the most from antibiotics [ 21 ]. The robustness and accuracy of CRP-POCT compared with laboratory testing have been demonstrated by diagnostic studies [ 22 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other bacterial pathogens -Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Bordetella pertussis, and Legionella pneumophila -were also identified; methods and results have been reported elsewhere. 14,15 After frozen transport, undertaken by the laboratory of the University of Antwerp, susceptibility testing to a uniform panel of antimicrobial agents was performed for S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae only, using the Etest or agar dilution method at Karolinska Institutet in Stockholm, Sweden, and at the University of Oxford, UK, respectively. Minimum inhibitory concentrations of H. influenzae to ampicillin and tetracycline were performed; the same was done for S. pneumoniae to penicillin G, amoxicillin, erythromycin/ clindamycin, tetracycline, chloramphenicol, trimethoprim/ sulfamethoxazole, levofloxacin, and cefotaxime.…”
Section: How This Fits Inmentioning
confidence: 99%