2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10278-020-00332-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting the Response to FOLFOX-Based Chemotherapy Regimen from Untreated Liver Metastases on Baseline CT: a Deep Neural Network Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A reliable assessment of response to chemotherapy is of paramount importance for the personalized treatment decision-making process to determine eligibility for surgery, or the need for second-line treatments[ 53 ]. Discriminating responsive from unresponsive nodules or new lesions on the CT scan often represents a challenging task for radiologists, therefore Maaref et al [ 54 ] developed a fully automated framework based on DL CNN that achieved an accuracy of 0.91 (95%CI: 0.88-0.93) for differentiating treated and untreated lesions, and 0.78 (95%CI: 0.74-0.83) for predicting the response to a FOLFOX + bevacizumab-based chemotherapy regimen. Similarly, the DL radiomics model by Wei et al [ 55 ] was able to predict response to chemotherapy (CAPEOX, mFOLFOX6, FOLFIRI or XELIRI regimens) of CRLM based on contrast-enhanced CT according to the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors with an AUC in the validation cohort of 0.820 (95%CI: 0.681-0.959) that increases to 0.830 (95%CI: 0.688-0.973) combining the DL-based model with the CEA serum level.…”
Section: Ai Models For Treated Crlmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A reliable assessment of response to chemotherapy is of paramount importance for the personalized treatment decision-making process to determine eligibility for surgery, or the need for second-line treatments[ 53 ]. Discriminating responsive from unresponsive nodules or new lesions on the CT scan often represents a challenging task for radiologists, therefore Maaref et al [ 54 ] developed a fully automated framework based on DL CNN that achieved an accuracy of 0.91 (95%CI: 0.88-0.93) for differentiating treated and untreated lesions, and 0.78 (95%CI: 0.74-0.83) for predicting the response to a FOLFOX + bevacizumab-based chemotherapy regimen. Similarly, the DL radiomics model by Wei et al [ 55 ] was able to predict response to chemotherapy (CAPEOX, mFOLFOX6, FOLFIRI or XELIRI regimens) of CRLM based on contrast-enhanced CT according to the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors with an AUC in the validation cohort of 0.820 (95%CI: 0.681-0.959) that increases to 0.830 (95%CI: 0.688-0.973) combining the DL-based model with the CEA serum level.…”
Section: Ai Models For Treated Crlmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their accuracies were significantly better than those of clinicians. Moreover, deep learning of radiological images exhibited its potential value in assessing chemosensitivity[ 64 , 65 , 151 ]. For example, a CNN system was trained using 202 cases with colorectal cancer liver metastases and was validated to have good accuracy for predicting responses to FOLFOX combined with bevacizumab regimens based on CT information[ 151 ].…”
Section: Achievements Of Ann Research In Gi Diseasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, deep learning of radiological images exhibited its potential value in assessing chemosensitivity[ 64 , 65 , 151 ]. For example, a CNN system was trained using 202 cases with colorectal cancer liver metastases and was validated to have good accuracy for predicting responses to FOLFOX combined with bevacizumab regimens based on CT information[ 151 ]. The practicability of radiotherapy, anti-integrin therapy, traditional Chinese medicine, and immunotherapy could also be improved with the support of ANNs[ 152 - 155 ].…”
Section: Achievements Of Ann Research In Gi Diseasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peng et al [ 19 ] and Liu et al [ 20 ] similarly reached promising results using deep learning-based approaches for HCC. Temporal features [ 21 ] and deep learning [ 22 ] were also used to predict outcomes, but are sensitive to limited datasets without capturing links between lesion types. More importantly, these techniques only provide a binary classification and do not produce follow-up images which can be used to extract quantifiable parameters from perfusion analyses prior to TACE.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a clear need to produce robust forecasting methods allowing to re-treat patients with increased drug concentrations or changing paradigms. Previous methods are based on binary classification, with no capability to predict futures images from which physiological parameters of the tumor can be measured before treatment [ 22 ]. By capturing the relationships between tumoral modifications with TACE regimens in a domain translation framework with GCNs, this would allow to build additional knowledge on patient response to chemoembolization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%