2017
DOI: 10.1111/ele.12741
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting the spread of all invasive forest pests in the United States

Abstract: We tested whether a general spread model could capture macroecological patterns across all damaging invasive forest pests in the United States. We showed that a common constant dispersal kernel model, simulated from the discovery date, explained 67.94% of the variation in range size across all pests, and had 68.00% locational accuracy between predicted and observed locational distributions. Further, by making dispersal a function of forest area and human population density, variation explained increased to 75.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
82
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
82
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reducing the risk of human‐mediated dispersal at long distances, posed primarily by transport of wood, thus remains important, and the pattern and consequences of this type of dispersal could be investigated in future enrichment of our modelling framework. This further work could also build on previous studies on the human‐mediated spread of the PWN and other invaders (Hudgins et al., ; Pukkala, Möykkynen, & Robinet, ; Robinet et al., ), that have shown how a stochastic modelling component can accommodate random long‐distance dispersal events, such as accidental long‐distance transport of an invader, while accounting for driving factors such as the density and spatial distribution of roads, wood industries, and human population. Finally, future applications of our approach, dealing either with natural or human‐mediated dispersal, could incorporate recent results on the different susceptibility of pine species to the PWN (Pimentel et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Reducing the risk of human‐mediated dispersal at long distances, posed primarily by transport of wood, thus remains important, and the pattern and consequences of this type of dispersal could be investigated in future enrichment of our modelling framework. This further work could also build on previous studies on the human‐mediated spread of the PWN and other invaders (Hudgins et al., ; Pukkala, Möykkynen, & Robinet, ; Robinet et al., ), that have shown how a stochastic modelling component can accommodate random long‐distance dispersal events, such as accidental long‐distance transport of an invader, while accounting for driving factors such as the density and spatial distribution of roads, wood industries, and human population. Finally, future applications of our approach, dealing either with natural or human‐mediated dispersal, could incorporate recent results on the different susceptibility of pine species to the PWN (Pimentel et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…These 6,280 species distributions provide the building blocks for further ecological analyses, for instance, predicting faunal occurrences (Hudgins et al. ), defining connectivity across landscapes (García‐Feced et al. ), or yielding information on targeted species (e.g., Anacardium excelsum , predicted to cover 25% of Panama, and ranked in the top five species for carbon storage in Panama; Melgarejo et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relatively simple models have proven effective in explaining patterns of invasions, for example in forest pests (Hudgins, Liebhold, & Leung, ). To verify that the additional complexity of a joint model, with propagule pressure, environment and species traits (henceforth termed PET model), was worthwhile for the aquarium pathway, we compared the PET model to six simpler alternatives, four of which respectively included species traits only, environmental conditions only, both traits and environment, and propagule pressure only and two combining propagule pressure (PP) either with the environment or with species traits.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%