2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.socnet.2015.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting the trajectory of the evolving international cyber regime: Simulating the growth of a social network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8 The aim of this chapter was to bring the two disciplines closer together by pointing to the toolbox of stochastic network modeling as a bridge. After early work by Robins et al (2005) presenting stochastic network models as simulation engines, their use in the framework of generative social science is indeed increasingly being recognized, as witnessed by the publication of conceptual papers (Snijders & Steglich 2015;Stadtfeld 2018) and an increasing array of applied research using the approach (e.g., Adams & Schaefer 2016;Lakon et al 2015;Lehmann et al 2015;Schaefer et al 2013;Snijders & Kalter 2020;Steglich et al 2010). In particular, the approach has been recently applied in the study of subgroup emergence in social networks (Stadtfeld et al 2020), which we tried to replicate in this chapter.…”
Section: Discussion: Empirically Relevant Simulation Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 The aim of this chapter was to bring the two disciplines closer together by pointing to the toolbox of stochastic network modeling as a bridge. After early work by Robins et al (2005) presenting stochastic network models as simulation engines, their use in the framework of generative social science is indeed increasingly being recognized, as witnessed by the publication of conceptual papers (Snijders & Steglich 2015;Stadtfeld 2018) and an increasing array of applied research using the approach (e.g., Adams & Schaefer 2016;Lakon et al 2015;Lehmann et al 2015;Schaefer et al 2013;Snijders & Kalter 2020;Steglich et al 2010). In particular, the approach has been recently applied in the study of subgroup emergence in social networks (Stadtfeld et al 2020), which we tried to replicate in this chapter.…”
Section: Discussion: Empirically Relevant Simulation Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…65. Bianchi, Flache, and Squazzoni 2020;Finn et al 2019;Lehmann, Rolfsen, and Clark 2015;Stadtfeld, Takács, and Vörös 2020;Zhang et al 2015. where the sum in the denominator refers to all possible g +k states of the network, or the options available to i for toggling its network ties. 66 Similarly, the choice probabilities for behavior change are defined as…”
Section: A Computational Model Of Network-behavior Coevolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…65.Bianchi, Flache, and Squazzoni 2020; Finn et al 2019; Lehmann, Rolfsen, and Clark 2015; Stadtfeld, Takács, and Vörös 2020; Zhang et al 2015.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lehmann, et al (2015) and Nye (2014) offer examples of the use of regime theory in the area of cybersecurity, but Mačák is critical, describing reliance on norms as "vacuous" (2016, p. 131) and further evidence of crisis for the Westphalian state. A third view is available from the perspective of complex adaptive systems theory: acknowledging the recency of official recognition of cyberspace as a military domain --for NATO in the 1990s (Woudsma, 2013), and for the US a decade or so later in terms of official doctrine (U.S. Department of Defense, 2011, 2015) --Kessler and Warner (2013 describe what the authors of the Tallinn Manual are doing as uncertainty absorption.…”
Section: The Informational State and Challenges To The Westphalian Symentioning
confidence: 99%