2016
DOI: 10.1080/17435390.2016.1202352
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting toxic potencies of metal oxide nanoparticles by means of nano-QSARs

Abstract: These findings may provide an alternative method for prioritizing current and future MeONPs for potential in vivo testing, virtual prescreening and for designing environmentally benign nanomaterials.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
52
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(34 reference statements)
2
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The physico-chemical properties of the utilized nanofillers such as shape and composition can elicit adverse effects in biological systems including cytotoxicity, inflammation, and genotoxicity (Mu et al , 2016; Nel et al , 2013). The inclusion of nanofillers in polymers and their subsequent release during thermal decomposition prompts the inevitable question – can nanofiller intrinsic properties play a role on the release potential and subsequently influence toxicological profile when compared to the polymer only control?…”
Section: 0 Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The physico-chemical properties of the utilized nanofillers such as shape and composition can elicit adverse effects in biological systems including cytotoxicity, inflammation, and genotoxicity (Mu et al , 2016; Nel et al , 2013). The inclusion of nanofillers in polymers and their subsequent release during thermal decomposition prompts the inevitable question – can nanofiller intrinsic properties play a role on the release potential and subsequently influence toxicological profile when compared to the polymer only control?…”
Section: 0 Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most recently published Nano-(Q)SAR models (Fourches, Pu, and Tropsha 2011;Puzyn et al 2011b;Gajewicz et al 2015;Toropova et al 2015;Mu et al 2016;Pan et al 2016;Basant and Gupta 2017;Fjodorova et al 2017;Gajewicz 2017) have been developed based on a very small data set compared with the data sets underlying classic (chemical) (Q)SAR models. The problem of limited availability of experimental data that are suitable for nano-(Q)SAR modeling has been widely discussed in the literature (Puzyn et al 2011b;Oksel et al 2016;Banares et al 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When interacting with cells, PM nanoparticles can induce lipid peroxidation, cause intracellular oxidative stress, in -1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 crease cytosolic calcium ion concentration, activate EGF receptors, and disrupt normal electron transport leading to oxidative stress [27]. Metal oxide nanoparticles (MeONPs) have been known to cause cytotoxicity; the most harmful MeONPs are Tl 2 O/Tl 2 , Ag 2 O, and Au 2 O/Au 2 O 3 [28]. When airborne metals at indoor shooting ranges [9] form oxides, the most toxic to human health could be PbO/PbO 2 , MgO, NiO, ZnO, and CuO [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metal oxide nanoparticles (MeONPs) have been known to cause cytotoxicity; the most harmful MeONPs are Tl 2 O/Tl 2 , Ag 2 O, and Au 2 O/Au 2 O 3 [28]. When airborne metals at indoor shooting ranges [9] form oxides, the most toxic to human health could be PbO/PbO 2 , MgO, NiO, ZnO, and CuO [28]. NiO is known to induce apoptosis by repressing SIRT1 [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%