2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2020.107557
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting treatment effects in unipolar depression: A meta-review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, web-based GCBT could be integrated into stepped care treatments if we understand how symptom severity predicts treatment response [40]. Identifying predictors of treatment response to GCBT could also aid the development of machine learning prediction models that use patient-level data to individualize student mental health care [41]. Predictors of treatment response for traditional interventions for mood disorders include sociodemographic variables (eg, age and sex) and clinical factors (eg, symptom profiles, comorbidities, and symptom severity) [41][42][43].…”
Section: Group Cognitive Behavioral Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, web-based GCBT could be integrated into stepped care treatments if we understand how symptom severity predicts treatment response [40]. Identifying predictors of treatment response to GCBT could also aid the development of machine learning prediction models that use patient-level data to individualize student mental health care [41]. Predictors of treatment response for traditional interventions for mood disorders include sociodemographic variables (eg, age and sex) and clinical factors (eg, symptom profiles, comorbidities, and symptom severity) [41][42][43].…”
Section: Group Cognitive Behavioral Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, treatment response prediction, if informed by reliable clinical and biological data, could increase the success of pharmacological treatment of MDD, reducing the quandary of the trial and error approach and ultimately leading to the identification of the most effective drug on an individual basis in a timely manner [7]. However, although research on risk prediction has produced clinically relevant models [8], treatment response prediction remains lacking [9]. Indeed, there have been several attempts to develop predictive algorithms of treatment resistance to antidepressants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is an approach that aims to offer a new perspective of secondary research (meta-research), a field hallmarked by the need to provide the most integrated evidence possible, and in which several novel study designs have appeared during the last years, e.g., series of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in a single Abbreviations: BMI body mass index, OR odds ratio, RR relative risk, 95% CI 95% confidence interval Note: In this table, only statistically significant risk factors that appeared in more than two studies were included publication, where the analytical unit is the umbrella review study design [88]. Likewise, other attempts refer to field-wide meta-analyses, in which a meta-analysis of observational studies is conducted on the sum of risk factors under consideration [87], or to the synthesis of systematic reviews (e.g., in Neurology [89]), systematic reviews of systematic reviews [90], overviews of systematic reviews [91], meta-reviews [92], systematic meta-reviews, comprehensive reviews [93], research-on-research [94], and meta-meta-analyses [95,96]; these are all terms and study designs that future meta-umbrella reviews should include in their search strategy. Therefore, our metaumbrella review could represent another study design added to the armamentarium of meta-research [97].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%