2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2010.07.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting turbulence modulations at different Reynolds numbers in dilute-phase turbulent liquid–particle flow simulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The comparison between the simulation and experiment showed that the new model was more accurate than the previous one. Hadinoto [27] adapted the two-fluid flow model to predict the turbulence modulation characteristic in a vertical pipeline at a low solid volume fraction from 0.5% to 4.0%. The numerical and experimental results showed that the drag correlation significantly affected the accuracy of the computational fluid dynamics (CFD simulation).…”
Section: Of 12mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comparison between the simulation and experiment showed that the new model was more accurate than the previous one. Hadinoto [27] adapted the two-fluid flow model to predict the turbulence modulation characteristic in a vertical pipeline at a low solid volume fraction from 0.5% to 4.0%. The numerical and experimental results showed that the drag correlation significantly affected the accuracy of the computational fluid dynamics (CFD simulation).…”
Section: Of 12mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the source terms in the k l -equation turned out to be related with the generalized drag term, and they include double correlations between the fluctuating velocities of the two phases, e.g., u v , which need to be modeled. Most of the available options are empirical or semi-empirical formulas developed for gas-solid flows (e.g., [60,61]), even if attempts to obtain such correlations from the KTGF and apply them to gas-solid and liquid-solid flows have been reported [62][63][64].…”
Section: Modelling Of Turbulent Flowsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To provide some context regarding the application of Eulerian-Eulerian-KTGF modelling to slurry flows, a high-level overview of the past 25 years of publications in this field shows that a vast majority of the studies relate to horizontal pipeline flows (e.g., [36,67,[132][133][134]), with only a few on vertical pipeline flows [63,135] and bends/fittings [136,137]. Pipe diameters of 10-500 mm, flow velocities between 1-9 m/s, bulk solids volume concentrations up to 0.5, density ratios of 1.18 (slush nitrogen [138]) to 4.35 (iron ore slurry [139]), and particle sizes of 0.004-2.4 mm have been studied.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Searching the literature for current numerical studies trying to characterize on turbulence attenuation for solidliquid settling suspensions, some manuscripts are found where: drag correlations are modified in an attempt to reproduce experimental data where turbulence modulation occurs (Hadinoto, 2010;Hadinoto & Chew, 2010); singlephase Low Reynolds turbulence models are modified to incorporate turbulence modulation (Bartosik, 2010;Bartosik, 2011); Mixture Models with a Low Reynolds Turbulence closure for turbulence modulation in highly concentrated solid-liquid flows (Silva et al, 2013); EulerEuler model is used for pipe flow of concentrated slurries (Kaushal et al, 2012;Lahiri & Ghanta, 2010).…”
Section: Turbulence Modulationmentioning
confidence: 99%