2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1127(02)00581-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting understory light microclimate from stand parameters in young paper birch (Betula papyrifera Marsh.) stands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
41
2
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
11
41
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On May [18][19]2004, CBE sensors were calibrated against a quantum PAR sensor (LI-191SB from Li-Cor Inc., Lincoln, NE, USA). A fourth order polynomial without intercept term was adjusted in order to predict PPFD from output voltage of the sensors.…”
Section: Light Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On May [18][19]2004, CBE sensors were calibrated against a quantum PAR sensor (LI-191SB from Li-Cor Inc., Lincoln, NE, USA). A fourth order polynomial without intercept term was adjusted in order to predict PPFD from output voltage of the sensors.…”
Section: Light Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, since PACL is directly determined by canopy structure, it would be possible to link PACL values under the canopy to stand-scale evaluated characteristics [17,18,33,51,53,58]. This approach is relatively effective but the relationships are generally obtained for a specific stand structure and silvicultural and ecological context.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, site effects could not be tested using our data set. Although fairly large differences in soil type and geographic location did not significantly affect stand structure-light relationships in other forest types (Messier et al 1998, Comeau and Heineman 2003, Sonohat et al 2004, the models presented here should be tested prior to use in eastern and western regions of the range of white pine-red pine forests. Finally, GLI values reported here are estimates of canopy transmittance, and represent the maximum average understory light levels associated with, for example, a given stand basal area or density.…”
Section: Conclusion and Management Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…En varios estudios, las mediciones del área basal, densidad y altura de los árboles, dimensiones de las copas y el índice de área foliar (en forma individual o en combinación) se han correlacionado bastante bien con la radiación solar bajo el dosel de copas (Comeau & Heineman, 2003;Promis, Schindler, Reif, & Cruz, 2009). Sin embargo, y aunque las correlaciones son razonables, tales relaciones deberían ser solamente utilizadas dentro del rango de condiciones de rodal que fueron consideradas en el muestreo (Comeau, 2000).…”
Section: Indirect Estimates Of the Light Environment In Forestsunclassified
“…In several studies, the measurements of basal area, tree density and height, crown dimensions and leaf area index (individually or in combination) have been fairly well correlated with below-canopy solar radiation (Comeau & Heineman, 2003;Promis, Schindler, Reif, & Cruz, 2009). However, although the correlations are reasonable, such relationships should be only utilized within the range of stand conditions considered in the sampling (Comeau, 2000).…”
Section: Indirect Estimates Of the Light Environment In Forestsmentioning
confidence: 99%