1995
DOI: 10.1016/8756-3282(94)00045-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting vertebral deformity using bone densitometry at various skeletal sites and calcaneus ultrasound

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
77
1
9

Year Published

1996
1996
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 190 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
5
77
1
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Reproducibility was 0.009 g/cm 2 for spine BMD, 0.014 g/cm for distal radius BMC, 0.015 g/cm for proximal radius BMC, 0.003 g/cm 2 for calcaneus BMD, and 3.6 dB/ MHz for calcaneus BUA measurements. 9,10 Fracture diagnosis…”
Section: Bone Density and Broadband Ultrasound Attenuation Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reproducibility was 0.009 g/cm 2 for spine BMD, 0.014 g/cm for distal radius BMC, 0.015 g/cm for proximal radius BMC, 0.003 g/cm 2 for calcaneus BMD, and 3.6 dB/ MHz for calcaneus BUA measurements. 9,10 Fracture diagnosis…”
Section: Bone Density and Broadband Ultrasound Attenuation Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low BMD and height loss, for example, are associated with increased vertebral fracture prevalence. (9,11,12) However, vertebral fracture causes height loss and reduced mobility, which in turn, can decrease BMD. This makes the interpretation of cross-sectional studies difficult.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,10,27,[39][40][41][42][43][44][45] Some of the earliest strongest evidence to support the use of QUS for discriminating between osteoporotic fractures and controls has come from large prospective studies. The first of these was published in 1990, when Porter et al measured 1 414 women over the age of 69 who were in residential accommodation.…”
Section: Fracture Discriminationmentioning
confidence: 99%