Predicting water in the crest of a giant gas field: Ormen Lange Hydrodynamic Aquifer Model

Abstract

Hydrodynamic aquifer conditions have been described in many basins around the world since first introduced by Hubbert1 in 1953. The hydrodynamic aquifer concept in Ormen Lange has been assessed using iso-potential mapping1 and dynamic simulation of the fluid fill development (i.e. imbibition) over geological time. Simulation shows2,3 the hydro-dynamically tilted/stepping contacts depend on rate of water flow across the aquifer, stratigraphic baffling and faulting, effective aquifer area and reservoir quality (NTG and effective permeability). The role of sealing faults over geological time scale is downplayed in terms of justifying the fluid distribution. Baffling during production is, however, expected. In Ormen Lange the hydrodynamic aquifer has pushed the gas from the crest of the structure into the south of the field leaving behind a northward-thickening prism of residual gas which is imaged by a seismic DHI. Confirmation of the hydrodynamic aquifer scenario in this field was achieved after drilling an appraisal well in the north of the structure that corroborated fluids (water with residual gas) and pressures as prognosed by the hydrodynamic aquifer model.

A Simplified Modeling Approach of Compaction-Induced Groundwater Hydrodynamic Activity in Hydrocarbon Reservoirs

“…In this study we discuss this two type of hydrodynamic activity in general. We used Eclipse software (Schlumberger, 2015) to simulate fluid flow in porous media.…”

“…The centripetal flow is due to down-dip meteoric water movement from high to low hydraulic potential (Toth, 2009). This mechanism was considered as the main mechanism of hydrodynamic flow in some oil and gas traps by Chiarelli (1973), Menjoz et al (1993), Ferrero (2012 and Person (2012). The centrifugal flow will occur when the basin has been filled by sediments, the deeper layers are being compacted.…”

Understanding Oil and Gas Shows and Seals in the Search for Hydrocarbons

“…This chapter expands on the U-V-Z method by illustrating how to work with grids and software packages to do the calculations. Grid manipulation provides much faster solutions and allows quick testing of alternative models, but utilizes the principles outlined by Hubbert and Dahlberg. Additional key papers dealing with pressures and hydrodynamics are those of (Beaumont and Fiedler 1999;Berg 1976;Dennis et al 2005;Ferrero et al 2012;He and Berkman 1999;Muggeridge and Mahmode 2012;Riley 2009;Robertson et al 2013;Swarbrick and O'Connor 2010).…”

“…An example where a perched water contact model has been changed to a hydrodynamic model is shown in a case history of the Ormen-Lange gas field in Norway (Cade et al 1999;Ferrero et al 2012). The discovery well was downdip, and in a different trap than an updip, and encountered substantial gas and then an 'apparent' water leg and transition zone.…”

“…As more wells were drilled and data collected, the perched water model was reevaluated and in 2012, a hydrodynamic tilt model was proposed (Ferrero et al 2012). The model differences are summarized in Fig.…”