i at Ma ¯noa Geographically isolated adolescents and families face barriers that might interfere with substance use treatment progress. Empirical literature for rural isolated youth is limited and it is unclear what therapeutic practices and approaches are associated with their substance use treatment progress. In a study of youth in Hawai'i receiving in-home treatment (N = 634), geographically isolated adolescents made comparable treatment progress relative to their nonisolated peers and had families that were somewhat more likely to be involved in treatment. Multilevel modeling indicated more practice techniques focused on the youth and/or the family predicted better progress. When entered simultaneously, youth-focused practices were the only significant predictor. Consistent monthly youth involvement in treatment predicted better progress, but this was not true for family involvement in sessions. Hawai'i's geographically isolated youth, their ecologies, and system of care policies might contribute to protective factors that support treatment progress, distinguishing them from youth in rural-based treatment studies elsewhere.
Public Health Significance StatementGeographically isolated adolescents and their families face several barriers that might interfere with substance use treatment progress. This study found that geographically isolated adolescents in Hawai'i receiving in-home treatment made similar progress in comparison to their nonisolated peers, and had families who were more often involved in services. Further, youth involvement in treatment, and treatment practices focused on both the youth and/or the family predicted better progress.