2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2019.10.072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction and optimization of slaughter weight in meat-type quails using artificial neural network modeling

Abstract: Carcass yield of meat-type quails is strongly correlated with the weight of the birds at slaughter (slaughter weight [ SW ]; body weight at 45 D of age). Moreover, prediction of superior animals for SW at the earlier stages of the rearing period is favorable for producers. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to predict and optimize SW of Japanese quails based on their early growth performances, sex, and egg weight as predictors through artificial neural network ( ANN … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Entering the big-data era and utilizing the high-throughput technologies in biological sciences widely influenced the contribution of mathematical models to extract biological concepts from the raw data ( Cogburn et al, 2007 ). Developing mathematical methods and employing artificial intelligence in the poultry science have become undeniable ( Jahan et al, 2020 ). It seems that modeling remains one of the most attractive research areas for scientists at least in the upcoming future decades.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Entering the big-data era and utilizing the high-throughput technologies in biological sciences widely influenced the contribution of mathematical models to extract biological concepts from the raw data ( Cogburn et al, 2007 ). Developing mathematical methods and employing artificial intelligence in the poultry science have become undeniable ( Jahan et al, 2020 ). It seems that modeling remains one of the most attractive research areas for scientists at least in the upcoming future decades.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, 2000 ; Grossman and Koops, 2001 ; Savegnago et al . , 2012 ), predicting future records and trends ( Adams and Bell, 1980 ; Brand et al, 2012 ; Faraji-Arough et al, 2019 ; Jahan et al, 2020 ), evaluating progress through the selection process ( Savegnago et al . , 2012 ), and also estimating deviation from the expected production curve ( Alvarez and Hocking, 2007 ; Johnston and Gous, 2007 ; Faraji-Arough et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%