2005
DOI: 10.1007/s00421-005-0061-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction and validation of total and regional skeletal muscle mass by ultrasound in Japanese adults

Abstract: The present study was performed to develop regression-based prediction equations for skeletal muscle (SM) mass by ultrasound and to investigate the validity of these equations in Japanese adults. Seventy-two Japanese men (n=38) and women (n=34) aged 18-61 years participated in this study and were randomly separated into two groups: the model development group (n=48) and the validation group (n=24). The total and regional SM mass were measured using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) 1.5 T-scanners with spin-echo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
211
1
6

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 211 publications
(225 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
7
211
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The R 2 was low and SEE value was high in the present study compared with the respective values obtained in a previous study, which used DXA to predict SM mass in children (R 2 value, 0·98; SEE, 0·565 kg, approximately 5 % of the mean measured SM mass) (2) . However, the prediction model in the present study yielded a similar R 2 value and a low SEE, compared with the corresponding values yielded by the ultrasonography-derived prediction equations for the estimation of total and regional SM mass and volume in adults (7) . Based on the estimation accuracy and the ease of obtaining measurements, ultrasonography-derived prediction in prepubertal children has a great potential as a technique for the assessment of total and regional SMV, especially in field settings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The R 2 was low and SEE value was high in the present study compared with the respective values obtained in a previous study, which used DXA to predict SM mass in children (R 2 value, 0·98; SEE, 0·565 kg, approximately 5 % of the mean measured SM mass) (2) . However, the prediction model in the present study yielded a similar R 2 value and a low SEE, compared with the corresponding values yielded by the ultrasonography-derived prediction equations for the estimation of total and regional SM mass and volume in adults (7) . Based on the estimation accuracy and the ease of obtaining measurements, ultrasonography-derived prediction in prepubertal children has a great potential as a technique for the assessment of total and regional SMV, especially in field settings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…For cadaveric studies, the CV from test-retest analyses was approximately 1 % (10) . Based on previous research that developed regression-based prediction equations for the estimation of SM mass using ultrasonography in adults (7) , the parameters of the ultrasonography-predicted equations for SMV in the present study were determined as muscle thickness in centimetres (cm) × standing height in metres(m). The following calculations were used: 'arm' = lateral forearm + anterior and posterior upper arm muscle thicknesses; 'trunk' = abdomen + subscapular muscle thicknesses; 'thigh' = anterior and posterior thigh muscle thickness; 'lower leg' = anterior and posterior lower leg muscle thickness; 'total' = 'arm' + 'trunk' + 'thigh' + 'lower leg'.…”
Section: Predicted Skeletal Muscle Volume By Ultrasonographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) and volume were determined using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), as described previously (Abe et al, 2003;Abe et al, 2006;Sanada et al, 2006). MRI images were prepared using a General Electric Signa 1.5 Tesla scanner (Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA).…”
Section: Upper-leg Muscle Volumementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Emerging literature highlights that musculoskeletal ultrasonography may be useful for assessment of muscle or lean tissue mass 10, 11. Ultrasound is a non‐invasive, readily available, and cost‐effective option that can be applied at the bedside to assess the thickness or cross‐sectional area (CSA) of specific muscle groups at predefined landmarks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultrasound is a non‐invasive, readily available, and cost‐effective option that can be applied at the bedside to assess the thickness or cross‐sectional area (CSA) of specific muscle groups at predefined landmarks. Comprehensive protocols, such as the nine‐site protocol—which images anterior and posterior muscle groups in a standing posture,12 have been shown to strongly associate ( R 2  = 0.94) with whole‐body lean tissue or muscle mass 10, 13. However, few bedside viable ultrasound protocols, such as the four‐site protocol—which images the anterior muscle thickness of both quadriceps,14 have been assessed for accuracy in predicting muscle or lean tissue mass.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%