2006 10th International Workshop on Cellular Neural Networks and Their Applications 2006
DOI: 10.1109/cnna.2006.341607
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction Error Profiles allowing a Seizure Forecasting in Epilepsy ?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Prediction error profile as described in [3]. Electrode points 40-60 show reasonable prediction performance.…”
Section: Patientmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Prediction error profile as described in [3]. Electrode points 40-60 show reasonable prediction performance.…”
Section: Patientmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…A seizure precursor may be detected by changes of the so-called signal features derived from EEG signals. Many publications [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] have been addressed to this field of research, but the problem remains unsolved. It has been shown that algorithms based on CNN [11][12][13] provided new results in the field of EEG-signal analysis.…”
Section: F Gollas C Niederhöfer and R Tetzlaffmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They were also able to detect a pre-seizure phase for several minutes prior to the ictal state. Niederhoefer and Tetzlaff [49] used prediction error profiles to forecast seizures. They were able to show distinct changes minutes before seizure onset.…”
Section: Prediction Of Ictal States Using Eeg Analysis 251 the Preimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our previous results 10,11 showed that two CNN based approaches -the identification and prediction of EEG signals using Reaction-Diffusion CNN and delay-type discrete-time CNN (DT-CNN) -could be used to discriminate between a supposed pre-seizure state and a seizure free state in a statistical sense for the different long term recordings. However, these results take into account direct local couplings of EEG channels only and disregard possible couplings of spatially seperated regions of the brain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%