2022
DOI: 10.5070/g601153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction in the maze: Evidence for probabilistic pre-activation from the English a/an contrast

Abstract: The idea that comprehenders predict upcoming linguistic content has become core to many theories of language processing. Experimental studies exploiting morphosyntactic and phonotactic constraints on a word form preceding a high cloze target word have been key to underpinning predictive accounts of comprehension, but investigating these tight sequential contrasts with traditional behavioral methods is difficult. The maze task, with its more focal measure of incremental processing, may provide a cheap and easy … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, although the role of predictive processing in music perception and production is largely agreed upon and has a long research history (e.g., Huron, 2008;Meyer, 1956), prediction in language has long been neglected and often denied in linguistics, considering the vast number of possible word combinations (e.g., see discussions in Ferreira & Chantavarin, 2018;Huettig, 2015;Huettig & Mani, 2016;and Kutas et al, 2011). However, more recent papers are coming to the conclusion that prediction is a fundamental element of the activation of linguistic representations in the brain (Ferreira & Chantavarin, 2018;Ferreira & Qiu, 2021;Huettig et al, 2022;Husband, 2022), with the caveat that prediction might only occur when there are somewhat constraining circumstances (Huettig et al, 2022).…”
Section: Syntax and Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, although the role of predictive processing in music perception and production is largely agreed upon and has a long research history (e.g., Huron, 2008;Meyer, 1956), prediction in language has long been neglected and often denied in linguistics, considering the vast number of possible word combinations (e.g., see discussions in Ferreira & Chantavarin, 2018;Huettig, 2015;Huettig & Mani, 2016;and Kutas et al, 2011). However, more recent papers are coming to the conclusion that prediction is a fundamental element of the activation of linguistic representations in the brain (Ferreira & Chantavarin, 2018;Ferreira & Qiu, 2021;Huettig et al, 2022;Husband, 2022), with the caveat that prediction might only occur when there are somewhat constraining circumstances (Huettig et al, 2022).…”
Section: Syntax and Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%