2020
DOI: 10.21037/apm-20-182
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction model for death in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis accompanied by respiratory failure in ICU: retrospective study

Abstract: Background: The mortality rate of pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) patients with respiratory failure remains high. This study aimed to identify factors contributing to death in these patients, and develop a mortality prediction model for pulmonary TB patients with respiratory failure.Methods: A retrospective study of patients admitted consecutively to the medical intensive care unit (ICU) of Beijing Chest Hospital, (Beijing, China), Chaoyang Fourth Hospital (Chaoyang, China) and Hebi Third People's Hospital (Heb… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The in-hospital mortality rate in the present study was 47.75% (53 out of 111), which is consistent to those previously reported (26–59%) though mechanical ventilated patients was markedly greater than 90% [6] , [9] , [22] , [23] , [24] . These variety rate were associated with clinical characteristics baseline, progressivity and respiratory support.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The in-hospital mortality rate in the present study was 47.75% (53 out of 111), which is consistent to those previously reported (26–59%) though mechanical ventilated patients was markedly greater than 90% [6] , [9] , [22] , [23] , [24] . These variety rate were associated with clinical characteristics baseline, progressivity and respiratory support.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a great growth of publications focused on machine learning models for predicting ICU mortality in a disease-specific manner, such as those by Pan et al [ 16 ], Lichtner et al [ 26 ], and Subudhi et al [ 27 ]. Meanwhile, many of the previous studies in this field also focus on predicting ICU outcomes for specific diseases or morbid conditions, like sepsis or death from pulmonary tuberculosis[ 11 , 13 , 28 ], which lead to an assessment of parameters specific for the disease studied, somewhat restricting the research. Many of the renowned models and scales for ICU mortality prediction demand a series of measurements to make their use possible, but not always all the data required are available.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of machine learning has been consolidated as an alternative for the development of predictive models of mortality in the critical care setting. An example is the retrospective study by Liu et al [ 11 ], who developed a logistic model of the death risk grade in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis using data from patients admitted to ICUs in three hospitals. In this multivariate analysis study, where the sensitivity was 83.3% and specificity was 73.1%, the Apache II score, C-reactive protein levels, albumin levels, and pressure of oxygen in arterial blood (PaO 2 ) were considered the main factors influencing the outcome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Information regarding positivity rate for acidfast bacilli was available in ten studies. The average acid-fast bacilli smear positivity rate was 89.05% (n = 366/411) (6,14,(16)(17)(18)(19)(20). All the studies had included patients with active tuberculosis only.…”
Section: Description Of Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A statistically significant difference was observed between groups with higher CRP levels among nonsurvivors (I 2 = 84%; p = 0.006; MD = -35.58 [-61.21 to -9.96]). Five studies compared the requirement for renal replacement therapy (8,(16)(17)(18)22). The requirement for renal replacement therapy was significantly higher in nonsurvivors (I 2 = 72%; p = 0.01; OR = 0.18 [0.05-0.67).…”
Section: Factors Affecting Outcomementioning
confidence: 99%