2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction model of chisel edge thrust force and material damage mechanism for interlaminar-direction drilling of UD-CFRP composite laminates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The regression coefficients (R 2 ) of the advanced models are 0.6751 and 0.8481 for the BFRP and CFRP, respectively. The R 2 of the CFRP composite model is in the range achieved by similar research works [37,[39][40][41][42]; thus, it is accurate enough to use. Although the method for the model building of the BFRP and CFRP composites is identical, the R 2 of the BFRP becomes significantly smaller than that of CFRPs.…”
Section: Comparison and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The regression coefficients (R 2 ) of the advanced models are 0.6751 and 0.8481 for the BFRP and CFRP, respectively. The R 2 of the CFRP composite model is in the range achieved by similar research works [37,[39][40][41][42]; thus, it is accurate enough to use. Although the method for the model building of the BFRP and CFRP composites is identical, the R 2 of the BFRP becomes significantly smaller than that of CFRPs.…”
Section: Comparison and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The machinability of CFRP is notorious [8], [9] due to its inhomogeneity, anisotropic nature and different composed phase properties of carbon fiber phase and matrix phase, which results in some easily detected defects including fiber pull-out, matrix cracking, burrs and delamination [2], [10], [11]. Beside of this, extrinsic factors, including tool geometry [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], tool material, support plates [18], [19], [20], machining parameters [12], [21], [22] and workpiece shapes [23], [24], can also influence the machined surface during drilling CFRPs.…”
Section: Machinability Of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer (Cfrp)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1116 However, excessively high drilling speeds can result in rapid tool wear and burn marks on the hole wall. 17 Other researchers have focused on tooling and machining methods. For example, Fernandes et al 18 reported that gun drills combined the advantages of low axial force, sharp cutting edges, and fast chip evacuation, which allowed them to quickly cut through fibers and reduce tearing and burrs at the entry and exit of the holes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%